Challenges and Strategies in Quality Assurance and Internationalisation of Higher Education in the Caribbean

ABSTRACT

1. Introduction
In the socioeconomic development of the Caribbean region, Higher education has continually played a crucial role in providing the skills and knowledge needed to drive growth and innovation. According to the 2020 World Bank report, the Caribbean’s workforce has been credited with advanced education and improved labour output by over 95 higher education institutions across the region, leading to growth and massive development in the region’s economy. Nevertheless, the region’s landscape is undergoing significant transformation, driven by the dual imperatives of quality assurance and internationalisation. These transformations, accompanied by challenges, have, however, been compounded by the increasing demand for accountability and transparency in educational quality and outcomes, as well as the necessity to attract and retain international students. As the Caribbean seeks to enhance its global competitiveness in the face of quality assurance and internationalisation, the necessity to identify the challenges, strategies and recommendations moving forward in higher education has become increasingly crucial. This paper thus explores the intricate relationship between quality assurance and internationalisation in the Caribbean, examining the specific obstacles that institutions encounter in these areas. Furthermore, it will highlight effective strategies that can be employed to overcome these challenges so as to foster a robust framework for quality assurance that not only meets regional needs but also positions Caribbean higher education on the global stage for contributing towards enhancing the quality and relevance of higher educational advancement.
2. Understanding quality assurance and internationalization of higher education in the Caribbean.
In higher education within the Caribbean context, understanding quality assurance and internationalisation requires a nuanced exploration of both concepts and their interrelationship. While quality assurance refers to the systematic processes and policies that institutions implement to ensure that educational standards are met and continuously improved, internationalisation, on the other hand, involves integrating international, intercultural, and global dimensions into the ethos and outcomes of higher education. The quality assurance process encompasses various dimensions, including curriculum development, faculty qualifications, student support services, and institutional governance, while the process of internationalisation includes establishing partnerships with foreign institutions, promoting student and faculty mobility, and incorporating global perspectives into curricula. The interplay between these two terms is necessary for the success of higher education. Quality Assurance (QA) mechanisms provide the framework for maintaining high standards of education, which is crucial for attracting international students, forming global partnerships, and enhancing the international reputation of institutions. Additionally, it is noted that effective QA practices, such as accreditation and quality reviews ensure that educational programs meet global standards, thereby facilitating the recognition of qualifications across borders and supporting student and staff mobility; whilst, internationalisation drives improvements in QA by introducing diverse perspectives, promoting the adoption of best practices from around the world, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Thus, the relationship between QA and internationalisation is mutual and reinforces the quality assurance framework in higher institutions as well as supports the recognition of institutions in the global arena.
Further, in the Caribbean, quality assurance has become increasingly important as higher education institutions continue to strive to enhance their credibility and competitiveness on a global scale. In 2002, Miller noted that the Caribbean has experienced a surge in the number of universities, which necessitates robust quality assurance mechanisms to ensure that educational standards are upheld. It should be noted that new institutions and mergers of educational institutions have continued to thrive in the Caribbean ever since 2002. Owing to these developments, the Caribbean region has recognised the importance of effective quality assurance practices and internationalisation and has ventured into different initiatives and collaboration as means to enhance their educational quality, broaden access to diverse learning experiences, and prepare graduates for a globalised workforce.
Notably, the state of quality assurance and internationalisation in the Caribbean higher education has its own structure and strategies, which are similar in some ways to other quality assurance agencies. Therefore, it is essential to explore studies and reports to draw out information on the practices of QA and internalisation in the region, which will provide the pathways for identifying the challenges and feasible recommendations. In the Caribbean, quality assurance is primarily implemented through accreditation processes, peer reviews, and self-assessment mechanisms. The University of the West Indies (UWI), as a leading institution in the region, developed a comprehensive quality assurance system that includes regular evaluations of academic programs, faculty qualifications, and institutional governance. Additionally, with organisations such as the Caribbean Area Network for Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education (CANQATE) and the University Council of Jamaica (UCJ), the Caribbean institutions’ quality assurance operates under these agencies’ established standards for the region. The Caribbean Community (CARICOM), comprising fifteen member countries, has also been active in supporting QA initiatives established to harmonise the educational standards across member states, enhancing the recognition of qualifications and promoting student mobility. They envision a network of External Quality Assurance Agencies (EQAAs) and develop common standards and measures for quality assurance and accreditation for the region. Notably, these groups collaborate and are instrumental in providing quality and internationalisation in the Caribbean higher education. They pursue internationalisation through various strategies, including establishing partnerships with foreign institutions, promoting student and faculty mobility, and integrating global perspectives into curricula (UWI, n.d). It should be noted that many Caribbean universities actively engage in international collaborations, such as exchange programs and joint research initiatives, enhancing their global visibility and academic offerings.
Further, with CANQATE playing a crucial role regionally in overseeing the guidelines and principles that support QA and internationalisation efforts, its approach is quite similar to other quality assurance and accreditation agencies of other regions across the continents. CANQATE develops and harmonises standards across the Caribbean, facilitates the mutual recognition of qualifications within the Caribbean and beyond, and supports student and staff mobility to align with global quality standards. CANQATE further worked towards promoting quality culture from governance and management to teaching and learning, and they continue to ensure that institutions are committed to continuous improvement in meeting the expectations of international partners and students, building capacity and professional developments, providing guidelines for cross-border education and engaging in both regional and international networks to better support internationalisation. In the internationalisation landscape, CANQATE has made meaningful strides in Caribbean higher education by engaging with global QA networks and has tried to balance the need to address regional QA priorities with the broader goal of internationalisation. Although this has been challenged in several ways, it should be noted that the region still continues to work to align with global QA standards that facilitate international partnerships. Also, studies show that while CANQATE shares some commonalities with the quality assurance framework globally, there still exist some guiding principles that differ in terms of scope, regional focus, and some aspects of QA. The primary focus of CANQATE is on the Caribbean region, and thus, its QA principles are tailored to address the unique challenges and opportunities of Caribbean higher education, which includes considerations for its small island economies, linguistic diversity, and the need for regional integration of QA standards. Its accreditation also focuses on promoting regional coherence as well as catering to both public and private institutions with various modes of delivery, including traditional, blended, and online learning. CANQATE emphasis is on creating a collaborative environment where institutions can learn from each other and adapt QA practices to their specific contexts, and internationalisation is a key component of their principles as they encourage Caribbean institutions to adopt international best practices and cross-border partnerships for regional competitiveness.
Thus, the Caribbean pursuit of QA and internationalisation is influenced by regional dynamics of agencies with emphasis on cultural texts, setting the framework for quality assurance practices with which universities, colleges, and specialised institutions in the region are working to align with standards in order to expand their global reach.
3. Challenges in quality assurance and internationalisation in Caribbean higher education
As nothing comes without some challenges, quality assurance and internationalisation are faced with numerous challenges that have hindered the effectiveness of educational institutions in meeting both regional and global standards. With six major public universities in CARICOM – The University of the West Indies (UWI), which has major campuses in Barbados, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and an Open (Distance Education) Campus; the University of Guyana; University of Technology, Jamaica; Anton von Kom University, Suriname; University of Belize and the University of Trinidad and Tobago (UTT), and other private institutions and teacher training colleges, various multifaceted challenges have shown to reflect systemic issues and the unique context of the region. These challenges are unique, presenting opportunities and recommendations in both quality assurance and internationalisation practices.
3.1. Challenges in Quality Assurance (QA)
One of the primary challenges noted in the Caribbean QA is the inconsistency in quality standards across different institutions. While some universities, like the University of the West Indies (UWI), have established robust QA frameworks, many smaller or newer institutions lack the resources or expertise to implement similar standards effectively. This disparity, however, leads to a perception of uneven quality in higher education across the Caribbean, undermining the credibility of the entire system. As noted by Miller in 2002, the need for a unified approach to QA is critical in order to ensure that all institutions meet acceptable educational standards. Additionally, the established QA framework is noted to be inconsistent, outdated and slow across the region, hindering the implementation of effective quality assurance mechanisms.
Further, many Caribbean institutions face significant resource constraints, which impede their ability to develop and maintain effective QA processes as well as internationalisation efforts. Financial limitations often restrict the ability to invest in necessary infrastructure, faculty training and development, research capabilities and the technology that supports quality education. Staff are not well equipped for quality assurance practices and, in some cases, provided with even low budgets for their operations. According to the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) report on higher education in 2002, this lack of funding constraint has been compounded by the need for continuous professional development as institutions’ staff are unable to keep pace with global educational trends.
Further, technological integration has proven to be a challenge in some of the institutions in the Caribbean. As Bećirović noted in 2023, the integration of technology in education is uneven, thereby making some institutions lack the needed infrastructure and expertise. Additionally, some institutions with technological infrastructure have been faced with some form of resistance by staff. Some faculty and administration staff are noted to be hesitant in embracing changes that require significant shifts in teaching methodologies or curriculum design. This resistance slows the implementation of innovative practices that are essential for enhancing educational quality and global competitiveness.
Further, there have been some disparities in terms of quality education and accreditation. Different countries within the region have varying levels of QA infrastructure and commitment, leading to inconsistencies in accreditation processes and educational standards. Some Caribbean countries, such as Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago, have more established internal QA bodies and processes, while others are still developing their frameworks. This variability, as well as the absence of a QA approach across the region, has hindered the overall quality and competitiveness of Caribbean higher education.
Additionally, the emerging QA practices in higher education, which are characterised by increasing digitalisation, a focus on student outcomes, inclusivity, sustainability, and the need for international alignment, have become the new reality guiding the framework of quality assurance. With the rapid growth of online learning, especially accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, new QA frameworks specifically tailored for digital and online education are still being developed in some institutions, and many are still in the process of adapting or implementing the new realities into QA frameworks in the Caribbean. As a result, QA standards have been lowered, causing delays in the accreditation of programmes offered in institutions.
3.2. Challenges in Internationalisation
Internationalisation is increasingly recognised as a strategic priority for Caribbean higher education institutions. Knight, in 2015, noted that internationalisation efforts in the Caribbean include student and faculty exchange programs, the development of international partnerships, and the integration of global perspectives into curricula. These goals and strategies have their own share of challenges, hindering the potential benefits of internationalisation exchanges and partnerships.
A similar challenge is the financial constraint limiting the ability of institutions to invest in international partnerships, overseas campuses, or robust exchange programs. Institutions such as the University of the West Indies (UWI) have been at the forefront of internationalisation initiatives, establishing partnerships with universities worldwide and participating in international networks. However, with other institutions in the region’s geographic isolation and small market size, funds and less human capacity have hindered collaboration among potential international partners. Also, the lack of funds for the sustainability of models needed to support long-term international activities has led to the discontinuation of programs and international collaborations. Low funds or no funding in some cases, has caused some uncertainties affecting the continuity and reliability of international opportunities for students and faculty.
While internationalisation in the Caribbean Higher Education has shared some challenges, such as funding, inadequate infrastructure and technology, fewer human resources, etc, similar to the challenges of quality assurance, issues, such as cultural and linguistic barriers, global competition, limited brand recognition, and the struggle with aligning standards with global standards are still some prevalent challenges of internationalisation in the region.
Further, the Caribbean higher education institutions operate within a culturally and linguistically diverse region, which enriches and complicates their internationalisation efforts. With languages such as English, Spanish, Dutch and French, most especially spoken in institutions in the region, this diversity, though, with some advantages, presents challenges in aligning curricula and academic standards with international partners of different cultural and linguistic contexts. This also has inadvertently led to a struggle to align standards with global standards as well as, reducing the pool of experienced educators and administrators who are essential for driving internationalisation efforts in the region.
Additionally, in 2004, Knight identified global competition as another challenge with internationalisation in the Caribbean. Her report affirmed that Higher Institutions face increasing competition from universities in other regions, particularly in North America and Europe, as those institutions often have more established international networks, greater financial resources, and a longer history of international engagement, thus, making it challenging for Caribbean universities to attract international students and faculty. Also, Caribbean institutions often struggle with limited international brand recognition, which impacts their ability to attract international students and faculty. This, according to studies, is partly due to the relatively small size of Caribbean institutions, variations in qualifications across borders, and limited representation in global university rankings. Above all, while these peculiar challenges have abounded, they are testaments to the fact that Caribbean higher education institutions are making strides in quality assurance and internationalisation, working to address their challenges in order to improve their educational outcomes.

4. Strategy and recommendations
In Caribbean Higher Education, both quality assurance and internationalisation, are practised through a combination of established frameworks, policies, and collaborative initiatives aimed at enhancing educational standards and global engagement. The relationship between these two growth fundamentals is mutual and dependent on each other. Hence, addressing their challenges requires some strategic approaches and recommendations, as enumerated below.
Studies reveal that a unified regional quality assurance framework can help standardise practices across Caribbean institutions. This framework should be developed collaboratively by stakeholders, including governments, educational institutions, and accreditation bodies. Such a framework would provide clear guidelines and benchmarks for quality assurance processes, ensuring consistency and transparency across the region. Whilst the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) continue to play the pivotal role in facilitating this collaboration and promoting best practices among member states, the Caribbean Area Network for Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education (CANQATE) needs to upgrade and develop a Caribbean-wide quality assurance framework that sets minimum standards for curricula, faculty qualifications, and assessment. This framework must be clear, widely circulated and one that aligns with the overall goals of internationalisation.
Investing in capacity building is another essential recommendation for enhancing the effectiveness of QA systems and internationalisation efforts in the Caribbean. This is so crucial as institutions need to emphasise continuous training for academic staff to ensure that they stay current with global trends in education and research. Governments and institutions should provide support in allocating resources for faculty and administrative staff training on best practices in teaching and learning to enhance their QA and internationalisation efforts. As the fund for training is set up, similarly, funds should be allocated to develop infrastructure that supports quality education, such as technology for online learning and research facilities. Additionally, institutions and the government should work proactively in sourcing funds and grants to support the quality of the education offered in the region; this can help the region to be upright in offering unique value propositions and quality, which is critical for Caribbean institutions’ success in the global education market.
Further, as Miller noted in 2001, promoting collaboration among Caribbean institutions and with international partners will address some challenges related to both QA and internationalisation. His research suggested that more external networks be established for sharing resources, expertise, and best practices to help institutions improve their QA processes and expand their international reach. Strategic partnerships with international institutions across borders can be formed to facilitate student and staff exchanges, joint research, and other collaborative activities to build reputation and recognition globally.
Moreover, Caribbean institutions should integrate global perspectives into their curricula to align local educational offerings with international standards, as it appears that Caribbean institutions sometimes benchmark themselves against global education standards, such as those set by the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). Institutions in the region should adopt international best practices and incorporate international case studies that will promote cross-cultural competencies and the relevance of their programs in the global job markets. .
Also, institutions within the region should work towards promoting cultural exchange and understanding, such as language courses, cultural immersion programs, and international festivals, to leverage the issues with cultural and linguistic diversity among members. This will market their unique culture and attract students from abroad, fostering internationalisation and increasing both faculty and student capacity. Incentives, such as scholarships, can also be offered to international students and researchers.
Additionally, as the Caribbean continues to grow its QA and internationalisation, it is crucial for them to welcome new trends and prioritise enhancing students and the support rendered to them. Trends such as Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and competency-based learning, which prioritises the skills and competencies of students, and other new developments such as micro-credentials, online/virtual learning, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI), Cross-Border Quality Assurance (CBQA), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and decolonisation of internationalisation, which promote and include indigenous knowledge and perspectives in education systems, are all evolving in higher education. All of these have been born through research-driven approaches to enhance the quality and global competitiveness in higher education. Quality Assurance Agencies in Caribbean institutions, thus, need to collaborate with the global QA network to monitor and evaluate their practices and leverage the new trends in addressing their challenges so as to remain recognised in a rapidly evolving academic landscape.

5. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this paper generally presents the challenges faced by Caribbean higher education institutions in the realms of quality assurance and internationalisation; studies show that issues are multifaceted and require a concerted effort from all stakeholders involved, both at the local and international levels. Undoubtedly, it is evident that specific initiatives have been taken in universities such as UWI (University of The West Indies) to promote quality assurance and internationalisation. However, there is still the need for a cohesive regional framework, capacity building, and the promotion of more collaborative networks to overcome the obstacles. Thus, as the Caribbean continues to navigate the complexities of quality and internationalisation of the institutions and programmes, embracing the strategies and recommendations will not only enhance the quality of education but also elevate the region’s standing in the international academic community and ultimately contribute to their sustainable development and economic growth.
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
Altbach, Philip G., and Jane Knight. “The
Internationalisation of Higher Education: Motivations and
Realities.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11, no. 3-
4 (2007): 290-305.
Bećirović, Senad. “Challenges and Barriers for Effective Integration of Technologies into Teaching and Learning.” In Digital Pedagogy: The Use of Digital Technologies in Contemporary Education, pp. 123-133. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023.
Biggs, John, Catherine Tang, and Gregor Kennedy. Teaching for Quality Learning at University 5e. UK: McGraw-Hill Education, 2022.
CANQATE. “Report on the Scoping Study of Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education in the Caribbean,” 2014.
CANQATE 2019. Google, Accessed Sept 12, 2024, https://canqate.org/.
CANQATE 2021. “Capacity Building Initiatives for Quality Assurance in the Caribbean,” CANQATE 2021.
Caribbean Community (CARICOM), “Report on Higher Education in the Caribbean,” 2015.
Cavusgil, S. Tamer, and Gary Knight. “The Born Global Firm: An Entrepreneurial and Capabilities Perspective on Early and Rapid Internationalisation.” Journal of International Business Studies 46 (2015): 3-16.
Dill, David. “Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Practices and Issues.” The 3rd International Encyclopedia of Education, 2007.
ElKaleh, Eman S. “Internationalisation Models and Strategies in Higher Education: A Conceptual Model for Internationalising the Curriculum.” In Internationalisation of Educational Administration and Leadership Curriculum, (2021) pp. 69-88.
Ewell, Peter T. “U.S. Accreditation in the Context of Global Quality Assurance Practice.” National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2015.
Flora, Laszlo. “Internationalisation in Isolation: The Place and Impact of Internationalisation in Higher Education Prison Initiatives.” Internationalisation of Higher Education-Policy and Practice 1 (2024): 21-39.
Grifoll, Josep, Achim Hopbach, Anthony McClaran, A. Valeikiene, T. Sanchez, and P. Ranne, Quality Procedures in the European Higher Education Area and Beyond–Internationalisation of Quality Assurance Agencies 4th ENQA survey (Brussels: ENQA), 2015.
Jaupart, Pascal. “International Migration in the Caribbean.” World Bank, 2023.
Knight, Jane. “Updated Definition of Internationalisation.” International Higher Education 33, (2003): 1-2.
Knight, Jane. “Internationalisation Remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales.” Journal of Studies in International Education 8, no. 1 (2004): 5-31.
Knight, Jane. “Cross-Border Higher Education: Issues and Implications for Quality Assurance and Accreditation.” Report: Higher Education in the World 2007:
Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake? (2007).
Mazzarol, Tim, and Geoffrey N. Soutar. “Push‐pull” Factors Influencing International Student Destination Choice.” International Journal of Educational Management 16, no. 2 (2002): 82-90.
Miller, Errol L. “Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Commonwealth Caribbean,” (2002): 1-12.
Perkins, K. Anna. Quality in Higher Education in the Caribbean. Jamaica: University Press of the West Indies, 2015.
Stein, Sharon, and V. De Oliveira Andreotti. “Decolonization and Higher Education.” Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Singapore: Springer Science+ Business Media 10 (2016): 978-981.
Schwartzman, Simon, ed. Higher Education in Latin America and the Challenges of the 21st Century. Vol. 162. Springer International Publishing, 2020.
Tilbury, Daniella. “Higher Education for Sustainability: A Global Overview of Commitment and Progress.” Higher Education in the World 4, no. 1 (2011): 18-28.
UNESCO, “Report on the Scoping Study of Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education in the Caribbean,” 2014.
University of the West Indies. (n.d.). Internationalisation Strategy.”
World Bank (IBRD). Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2002.
World Bank. “Annual Report PDF.” World Bank, 2020.