A B S T R A C T
The supportive role that diplomatic economic desks contribute to Africa’s Free Trade Area is the primary focus of this study, which explores the relationship between economic diplomacy and regional integration. Using a mixed-methods approach that includes quantitative analysis of trade data and interviews with diplomats and policymakers, the article explores how these specialized units within diplomatic missions support businesses, foster economic prospects, and promote trade agreements within the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) framework. The findings show that by offering market knowledge, promoting cross-border collaborations, and negotiating convoluted regulatory structures, diplomatic economic desks are essential to the advancement of regional integration in Africa. This article does, however, identify some major problems that make it hard for economic diplomacy to effectively promote regional integration goals. These include problems with institutions, a lack of resources, and complicated political factors. Therefore, to strengthen the effectiveness of diplomatic economic desks and fortify their support of Africa’s economic integration initiatives, the article ends with suggested measures and ideas for future study.
Introduction
1. Introduction
A crucial aspect of international relations, economic diplomacy involves the strategic use of diplomatic means to advance a country’s economic objectives and foster mutually beneficial business alliances with partner nation . This is particularly pertinent to Africa, where regional integration initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) aim to create a single market that enhances trade among African countries, stimulates economic growth, and positions the continent favourably in international trade . The potential of the AfCFTA to eliminate trade barriers and tariffs while standardizing trade laws for member states underscores its significance. This would facilitate the free movement of goods and services among member nations, attract foreign investment, and promote sustainable development across Africa’s varied economic landscapes. The importance of economic diplomatic desks in embassies and consulates is emphasized by their role in brokering trade agreements, advocating for trade dispute resolutions, and developing coordinated economic strategies that align with the broader goals of regional integration, illustrating the relevance of economic diplomacy as a tool for enhancing trade. Moreover, considering Africa’s historical context of regional integration, characterized by various trade groups and economic communities, highlights the dynamic nature of economic diplomacy. Consequently, to reconcile competing national interests and achieve harmonized economic integration, nations often employ intricate diplomatic strategies to address trade challenges, including political instability, infrastructure shortcomings, and varying economic capabilities . Therefore, it is imperative to thoroughly evaluate the role of economic diplomatic desks in supporting embassies and consulates in fulfilling the AfCFTA objectives to promote free trade within the African sub-region. Additionally, it is essential to assess their influence on the continent’s economic trajectory in achieving sustainable development goals for member countries, while considering the interaction between economic diplomacy and regional integration.
2. The Need to Appraise the Contributions of Diplomatic Economic Desks in Promoting Regional Integration Initiatives of AfCFTA.
Although the significance of economic diplomacy in promoting regional integration in Africa is widely acknowledged, little is known about the precise roles and efficacy of diplomatic economic desks in furthering the goals of AfCFTA . Without sufficiently addressing the complex roles that these specialized diplomatic units play in helping to facilitate trade negotiations, promote business prospects, and support the enforcement of trade agreements across member countries, their impact in fostering the success of AfCFTA would be unappreciated. This gap tends to widen since literature tends to concentrate on economic diplomacy or regional integration in general . This lack of awareness limits the influence of diplomatic economic desks on boosting intra-African trade and economic cooperation within the subregion by impeding the development of focused initiatives that make the most of them.
Additionally, Mogashwa posit that, the complexities surrounding Africa’s varied political, economic, and social environments present peculiar constraints that impact the diplomatic economic desks’ ability to function effectively. These difficulties include institutional impediments, resource constraints, and shifting political dynamics in the continent, all of which have not been adequately discussed in the literature to date . The information gap is worsened by the absence of case-specific analysis and empirical data, which makes it challenging to evaluate current standards and pinpoint crucial success factors that could potentially guide strategic initiatives and policies targeted at enhancing these diplomatic units. Therefore, a thorough study that explores the unique roles, contributions, and difficulties of diplomatic economic desks within the context of the AfCFTA is imperative. To assess the role of diplomatic economic desks in facilitating trade agreements and fostering economic cooperation within the framework of the AfCFTA, it is crucial to analyze the mechanisms through which diplomatic economic desks contribute to overcoming barriers to regional integration, including regulatory disparities and non-tariff obstacles. This would offer a more comprehensive view of how economic diplomacy can sustainably promote regional integration initiatives and propel economic growth throughout Africa.
2.1. Abbreviations and Acronyms meanings
Economic diplomacy: Describes how a nation uses its economic resources and policies to accomplish its foreign policy goals. It entails encouraging international investment, commerce, and economic cooperation, often through agreements and discussions.
Sustainable Development: This method of development aims to satisfy current demands without endangering the capacity of succeeding generations to satisfy their demands. It aims for a long-term, balanced approach to development by including social inclusion, economic progress, and environmental conservation.
The African Continental Free Trade Area ( AfCFTA),: is a trade pact between member nations of the African Union that aims to establish a single continental market for goods and services with unrestricted trade, investment, and business mobility. In terms of the number of member nations, it is among the world’s biggest free-trade regions.
The diplomatic economic desk: is a dedicated division that deals with economic matters in a nation’s foreign ministry or embassy. It is in charge of advancing the nation’s economic interests overseas, enabling investment and commerce, and offering economic analysis and counsel to aid diplomatic initiatives.
Trade policy: Describes a government’s approach and regulations pertaining to global commerce. It consists of import and export laws, trade agreements, taxes, and other policies that affect how a nation engages in international commerce. Protecting homegrown industries, promoting economic development, and accomplishing other national goals are the goals of trade policy.
3. Economic Diplomacy and its Relevance to Achieving AfCFTA Objectives
As the world economies become more interconnected and economic factors become increasingly influential in international relations. This phenomenon have altered the concept and practices of economic diplomacy in the past few decades . The use of diplomatic instruments and funds to further a nation’s economic interests abroad is the fundamental definition of economic diplomacy, which includes everything from trade talks and investment development to economic intelligence collection and policy coordination. In Africa, for example, where economic relevance typically translates into geopolitical influence, this comprehensive approach to diplomacy acknowledges the unbreakable link between political and economic power. According to Mrani, the relevance of economic diplomacy amidst these dynamic changes still remains relevant for countries to focuses on supporting businesses at the micro level, to macroeconomic relevance with the aim to influence the international economic system . In the realm of international relations, nations use economic diplomacy as a vital weapon to negotiate the complex system of transnational economic barriers, bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, and global economic governance.
Economic diplomacy today embodies a change from the previously conventional diplomacy which prioritizes political and security concerns to a more comprehensive strategy that acknowledges the importance of economic interests in the creation and implementation of foreign policy. This very dynamics is what AfCFTA stands to correct through its operational initiatives. This development is a reflection of the shifting dynamics of power in international relations, where trade impact on the global economy assumes as much impact on world events equivalent to military force . Hence, the AFCFTA mandate asserts that by promoting collaboration and coordination between states and non-state actors in Africa, economic diplomacy would then serve as a crucial tool in tackling transnational trade challenges that cut beyond national boundaries, including solving financial crises, climate change, and sustainable development that besiege the African continent. As nations look to capitalize on their combined economic potential through AfCFTA initiatives, economic diplomacy then assumes a greater significance in the African context . This underscores the need for complex diplomatic approaches that can strike a balance between national interests and regional integration objectives.
3.1. Theoretical Perspectives on Economic Diplomacy and AfCFTA Integration
One way to fully understand how economic diplomacy and regional integration work together in AfCFTA is to look at it through the lens of regional integration theories. These include functionalism, neofunctionalism, and intergovernmentalism. These theories are useful for breaking down the complicated ways that diplomatic efforts and the quest for free trade in Africa affect each other. The functionalist perspective, as expressed by Mitrany elucidates the role of economic diplomacy in promoting regional integration through collaboration in particular technical domains. For example, in trade promotion and import harmonization, which act as foundational elements for extensive economic integration under the AfCFTA, economic integration actors should embrace technological advancement as a tool for advancing their interest. This methodology is reflected in the incremental establishment of industry-specific standards within the AfCFTA system, exemplified by the Agreement on Trade in Goods, which tackles technical barriers to trade and lays the groundwork for more extensive collaborative economic partnership among member nations . The persistent challenges in converting technical bargains to political commitments, as demonstrated by the setbacks in the approval and implementation of AfCFTA protocols by certain member countries, highlight the drawbacks of functionalism in effectively conveying AfCFTA’s progress over the years. This setback thus, highlights the necessity for an increased awareness of the role that political forces assume in promoting regional integration initiatives.
Neofunctionalism, as explained by Haas, helps us understand how economic diplomacy can help regional integration through the principle of spillover. This is when an initial partnership in economic domains leads to collaboration in interconnected regions, which finally leads to better political coordination. This theory helps us to understand how the AfCFTA developed from earlier regional economic community (REC) projects to have a bigger mandate that it executes in recent times. For example, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the East African Community (EAC) both became integrated under this new mandate, which was the first step towards integrating the whole continent . The function of diplomatic economic desks in promoting this spillover effect is vital, as they act as channels that facilitate knowledge exchange, capacity building, and coordination of policies among member states. This effect makes it more likely that people will work together on things other than economics, like harmonising laws and settling disagreements. A current illustration of this spillover effect is evident in the ongoing discussions regarding the AfCFTA Protocol on digital trade, which has become a focal point for economic diplomacy due to the increasing significance of electronic commerce and the acceleration of the digitization element in intra-African trade. This exemplifies how economic collaboration can result in broader integration initiatives in related sectors .
Intergovernmentalism, as defined by Hoffmann and further developed by Moravcsik, offers a significant viewpoint on the influence of national interests and state-focused negotiations, especially in directing regional integration. This emphasize the crucial role of economic diplomacy in addressing the intricate array of national priorities within the AfCFTA framework. This theoretical framework elucidates the difficulties encountered by diplomatic economic desks in harmonising conflicting national interests, especially in delicate matters including lowering tariffs and regulations on product-origin bargaining, where nations can strive to protect local industries from competition or uphold trade concessions . The intergovernmentalist perspective is particularly pertinent for comprehending the disparate levels of dedication to AfCFTA implementation among member states, as demonstrated by the varying rates of tariff liberalisation plans and the current negotiations for country-specific exemptions to trade liberalisation measures. Economic diplomacy is essential in this setting as it enables intergovernmental talks, fosters agreement, and identifies constructive compromises that can further strengthen the integration objective of AfCFTA while resolving national interests that hinder the smooth flow of trade.
These different theories come together to make clear the complicated role of the diplomatic economic desks in promoting regional economic diplomacy and integrating the region under the AfCFTA framework. This function helps the unit to recognize the potential and constraints associated with advancing continental free trade. Alternatively, economic diplomacy can also acts as an inducer for effective cooperation and spillover effects, demonstrated by the gradual extension of AfCFTA protocols to encompass greater complexity aspects of economic integration, including regulating trade competitiveness and the protection of trademark and patent rights . This approach corresponds with neofunctionalist forecasts of gradual integration, propelled by the interdependence of economic sectors and the influence of transnational bodies such as AfCFTA in promoting trade collaboration. Conversely, the intergovernmentalist focus on national interests and state-centric negotiations which highlights the hardships and difficulties encountered by diplomatic economic desks in addressing political concerns and varying priorities of AfCFTA member states, especially in instances where local economic issues continue to clash with AfCFTA goals.
The connection among these theoretical approaches is shown in the current attempts to execute the AfCFTA’s trade promotional measures, whereby economic diplomacy is coordinated to reconcile technical cooperation with political alignment. The creation of the African Trade Observatory, a significant initiative backed by diplomatic economic desks, illustrates how effective such collaboration in data sharing and trade information systems can advance the broader integration objectives of the AfCFTA by improving transparency and enabling policy decisions based on evidence . The efficacy of these efforts depends on the commitment of member states to actively participate and execute the agreed measures, underscoring the continued significance of intergovernmentalist factors in the integration process
3.2. Methodology
In assessing the functionality and efficacy of diplomatic economic desks, a mixed-method approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques is adopted. These methods are especially well-suited for analyzing complex data which is typified by economic diplomacy and regional integration using interviews and questionnaires respectively from key stakeholders in the diplomatic sector and key voices from the AfCFTA front. These methods also acknowledge the subjectivity of individualized experiences and notions in the area of diplomacy and regional integration analyzed using statistical tools to draw inferences and trends. Using a sample of one member embassy or consulate in each regional demarcation of the continent operating in the AfCFTA headquarters country, Ghana, the study considered four countries representing the cardinal regions of the continent i.e., (north, east, south, and west). The study utilized Egypt, Rwanda, South Africa, Sierra-Leone embassies. Targeted twenty (20) stakeholders per embassy including Economic attaches, trade commissioners, investment promotion officers, policy analysts, and consular officers for surveys. The interview section concentrated on twenty (20) key voice respondents ranging from AfCFTA secretariat officials, trade negotiators, policy advisors, REC representatives, and private sector representatives.
4. Assessing the Functionality of Diplomatic Economic Desks in Promoting Economic Diplomacy Within AfCFTA Protocols
The qualitative analysis revealed that diplomatic economic desks, are indeed essential elements of embassies and consulates. function as specialised divisions focused on promoting a nation’s economic interests internationally. These desks act at the heart of diplomacy and economics, serving as the principal channel for economic diplomacy at foreign embassies. Their mission includes a wide range of activities designed to promote commerce, attract investment, and enhance economic cooperation with the host nation and the nation they represent. According to Hamilton,, these desks function along a spectrum of economic diplomacy, ranging from micro-level company assistance to macroeconomic policy involvement .
The functions of diplomatic economic desks are diverse, illustrating the intricate problems and possibilities in global economic interactions. They primarily function as information centres, collecting and distributing essential market knowledge to their home governments and local enterprises pursuing international growth. This function in mitigating the disparity in information is especially crucial in the African environment, where dependable market data is often limited. In addition, these offices play a big role in promoting trade, organising trade missions, letting people participate in international trade fairs, and connecting exporters with potential buyers in the host countries. This shows how important they are to achieving AfCFTA’s goals of promoting free trade in the subregion.
By presenting prospects, setting up meetings with possible investors, and offering advice on local business conditions, diplomatic economic desks seek to draw in foreign direct investment (FDI) to their home country. These specialized units within the embassies and consulates also participate in policy advocacy . Here, they advocate their nation’s economic interests in multilateral and bilateral trade discussions and contribute to trade policies and accords. These units are very relevant fostering the execution of the AfCFTA strategic goals, in which their role in economic discussions on tariff reductions, rules of origin, and non-tariff obstacles matters much.
Furthermore, these desks serve as solutions for enterprises, offering support in navigating regulatory frameworks, resolving trade conflicts, and overcoming bureaucratic obstacles. This role is crucial in the African context, where regulatory inconsistencies and complex bureaucracies significantly hinder cross-border trading. The efficacy of diplomatic economic desks then fluctuates considerably, affected by conditions such as resource distribution, staff skills, and the emphasis placed on economic diplomacy within broader foreign policy priorities.
Shinyekwa and his colleague writers posit that diplomatic economic desks’ role in the framework of African regional integration extends beyond promoting conventional international diplomatic and economic ties, but embrace a more comprehensive regional perspective . The scholars argued that these diplomatic units have stepped up their involvement in global trade by facilitating global economic partnerships, coordinating national opinions on regional economic policies, and endorsing the execution of regional integration efforts, such as the AfCFTA. This growing role therefore, necessitates that diplomatic economic desks cultivate knowledge in both bilateral economic interactions and the complex nature of broader economic integration procedures . According to Motadi, the differing capabilities of African nations to conduct operational economic diplomacy can be greatly influenced by the potential of these desks to adequately capitalise on prospects arising from regional integration initiatives, underscoring the necessity for periodic capacity development and resource allocation to improve their efficacy in advancing Africa’s economic integration and trade protocols .
4.1. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the Contributions of Diplomatic Economic Desks to AfCFTA’s Regional Integration Initiatives
To thoroughly assess the contributions of diplomatic economic desks to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), the study utilized a quantitative model and ably supported by the qualitative views from key stakeholders. The quantitative model employs a multiple linear regression framework, expressed as:
(y = a + b1(x₁) + b2(x₂) + b3(x₃) + b4(x₄) + \the corresponding error term).
Where:
• (a) denotes the effectiveness of high-level negotiations facilitated by diplomatic economic desks
• ( b ) signifies the extent of trade promotion activities undertaken by these desks.
• (y) represents the overall contribution to the success of the AfCFTA
• (x₁) denotes the effectiveness of high-level negotiations
• (x₂) indicates trade promotion activities,
• (x₃) signifies resource allocation, and
• (x₄) reflects institutional capacity.
The regression analysis yielded the following results:
Variable Coeff. (b) Standard Error t-value p-value
Intercept (a) 1.5 0.5 3.0 0.003
Effectiveness of negotiations (x₁) 2.0 0.4 5.0 <0.001
Trade promotion activities (x₂) 1.8 0.4 4.5 <0.001
Resource allocation (x₃) 0.5 0.1 5.0 <0.001
Institutional capacity (x₄) 1.2 0.3 4.0 <0.001
R-squared 0.75
Table 1: Regression Results Showing the Contribution of Diplomatic Economic Desks to AfCFTA Success
The regression analysis depicted in Table 1 above, shows that the model has significant explanatory power with an R-squared value of 0.75, pointing to a 75% of the variation in the total contribution to AfCFTA performance being accounted for by the four variables. All coefficients indicate a statistically significant position (p < 0.001). Thus, indicating that the factors contribute substantially to y, which connotes the overall impact of measuring both collectively and individually variables.
The coefficient for the Effectiveness of Negotiations (x₁) is 2.0, indicating that for each unit improvement in negotiation effectiveness by the diplomatic economic desks, the total contribution to AfCFTA success rises by 2 units, given that all other components remain unchanged. This corresponds with qualitative data indicating that diplomatic economic desks enhance high-level discussions, securing advantageous trade deals crucial for reconciling national interests with regional goals . Effective negotiations are essential since they immediately impact the decrease of tariffs, the removal of non-tariff barriers, and the standardisation of regulatory structures, which are vital for establishing integrated and viable intra-African economies.
Trade Promotion Activities (x₂) attained a value of 1.8, signifying a considerable positive influence on the success of AfCFTA. This indicator assesses the degree to which diplomatic economic desks coordinate missions to promote trade, business forums, and economic networking activities. This is backed up by qualitative data that shows these activities make it easier for local businesses to access markets and bring in a lot of foreign direct investment (FDI). This leads to more jobs, better technology, and better overall economic performance . The resilient coefficient shows how important trade promotion is for connecting local businesses with foreign partners, which in turn helps the economy recover and brings people together.
Under the resource allocation (x₃), the analysis depicted 0.5, suggesting that each extra unit of resource allocation enhances the general efficacy of AfCFTA by 0.5 units. For diplomatic economic desks to function effectively, they require resources such as human capital and financial inputs. These resources allow these units to do extensive market analysis, provide strategic recommendations, and assist organizations in managing the complex nature of trade and investment across borders. The qualitative insights highlight that resource limitations can impede the desks’ capacity to effectively execute their functions, corroborating the notion that adequate funding and personnel expertise are crucial for alleviating risks linked to international trade and improving trade facilitation initiatives .
Institutional Capacity (x₄), with a value of 1.2, indicates that enhancements in organizational structures substantially facilitate the achievement of AfCFTA goals. The strong organizational structures, legal frameworks, and regulations that underpin the desks’ operations are all part of institutional capability. A resilient institutional capability enables diplomatic economic desks to efficiently facilitate the alignment of national policies with regional integration goals, hence assuring cohesive economic strategy among member nations. The qualitative data underscores the significance of institutional support in empowering the desks’ ability to deliver vital functions, including adherence to regulations, promoting partnership development, and offering advisory assistance, which are crucial for enhancing trade across borders, thus advancing local economies .
Contrasting the quantitative results with qualitative insights from the key players in the industry uncovers a consistent and convincing story. Survey data reveals that the efficacy of bargaining and trade promotion efforts are the primary determinants of AfCFTA success, corroborated by qualitative findings that highlight the significance of these roles in the day-to-day activities of diplomatic economic desks officials. The findings revealed that stakeholders invariably recognize that bargaining and dialogues establish the essential compromises for economic integration, whereas trade promotion initiatives implement these deals by generating concrete economic prospects and growing business connections across the continent.
It is important to note that both the quantitative model and the qualitative responses emphasize the need for resilient regulatory structures and adequate resources to support the various functions of diplomatic economic desks. Stakeholders indicated that resource limitations and differing institutional capabilities tend to hinder the desks’ effectiveness, thereby restricting their contributions to regional integration and economic unification. The connection of similarity indexes between the quantitative and qualitative data reinforces the assertion that diplomatic economic desks are crucial for the effective execution of AfCFTA, as they engage in negotiation and trade promotion while also delivering vital support services that foster feasible economic advancement and resilience .
Furthermore, the model’s increased R-squared value and substantial coefficients corroborate the qualitative claims that diplomatic economic desks have a pivotal mediated function in harmonising national economic policies with regional integration objectives. The synthesis of the combination of quantitative findings and qualitative developments provides a comprehensive and statistically sound argument that diplomatic economic desks significantly improve the AfCFTA by utilizing negotiations, comprehensive economic strategies, appropriate resource deployment, and resilient institutional capacity.
The quantitative and qualitative analysis convincingly demonstrates the essential role of diplomatic economic desk in advancing the AfCFTA, as they adeptly negotiate trade agreements, foster wide trade activity, provide necessary resources, and enhance institutional capabilities. The significance and explanatory capacity of the regression model, corroborated by consistent qualitative stakeholder views, highlight the essential function of these desks in promoting regional integration and economic unification across Africa. This comprehensive method offers a statistically and contextually enhanced comprehension of the ways by which economic diplomacy facilitates the success of regional trade initiatives such as those initiated by AfCFTA.
5. Case Study Examples of Diplomatic Economic Desks and Their Contributions to AfCFTA
Three unique case studies are hereby listed that demonstrates their concrete contributions of diplomatic economic desks to regional integration efforts in sub-Saharan Africa. These desks showcase unique techniques and result-oriented ambitions that combined highlight the essential function of diplomatic economic desks in promoting the goals of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
Case Study 1: The Nigerian Economic Desk in Abuja
The Nigerian Economic Desk in Abuja exemplifies how diplomatic economic desks may adeptly maneuver through the cumbersome regional dynamics to achieve AfCFTA aspirations. Oyelami economic desk, which is part of the Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has played a key role in negotiating bilateral and multilateral trade agreements that complement the goals of the AfCFTA to increase trade among African nations while also benefiting Nigeria . Through the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the desk has cultivated reliable economic relationships with neighbouring West African nations, facilitating advancement of technology, structural development, and capacity building in Nigeria’s critical industries, thus augmenting the nation’s competitiveness within the AfCFTA framework.
The Nigerian desk has led regional infrastructure initiatives in partnership with ECOWAS member nations, including the establishment of international transport networks that facilitate the flow of commodities and services. Because of these efforts, logistics costs and transit times have gone down a lot, making Nigerian exports more competitive in the AfCFTA’s connected market. The desk has played a crucial role in facilitating collaborative efforts and cooperation that enhance the local economy, exemplified by the collaboration between Nigerian and Ghanaian manufacturers in automotive parts production, thus further integrating Nigeria’s manufacturing sector into the African market .
This instance underscores problems that include navigating power imbalances and addressing the interests of many stakeholders in the area. The Nigerian desk has used sophisticated negotiating techniques and flexible management procedures to get fair results for regional integration. During tariff reduction negotiations, the Desk reconciled Nigeria’s imperative to safeguard emerging industries with the AfCFTA’s objective of promoting liberalized trade, leading to a phased strategy for tariff reductions that addresses the developmental requirements of member states. The Nigerian diplomatic economic desk’s ability to make good trade deals and long-lasting business partnerships shows the important role that diplomatic economic desks play in promoting regional integration. The desk has promoted a more unified and robust West African economy within the AfCFTA framework by addressing national interests and regional goals.
Case Study 2: The South African Economic Desk in Pretoria
The South African economic desk illustrates the proactive function of diplomatic economic desks in promoting regional integration via extensive economic diplomacy under the AfCFTA. This desk, headquarters at Pretoria and having recognized presence in the headquarters of African Union (AU) and other Regional Economic Communities (RECs) such as the Southern African Development Community (SADC), has been very instrumental in negotiating large trade deals for their home country. These deals have indeed increased the quantum of trade between East African countries and South Africa thereby encouraging more economic integration in the region through the AfCFTA.
The desk has effectively promoted the removal of trade barriers and the standardization of regulations across several sectors, including manufacturing, services, and agriculture, via targeted lobbying and strategic policy alignment. The desk made it easier for SADC member states to agree on pharmaceutical standards. This helped South African pharmaceutical companies expand their market presence in the region and supported the AfCFTA’s goal of creating a unified pharmaceutical market in Africa . Furthermore, the desk has enabled many trade delegations and corporate conferences that have markedly enhanced South Africa’s export volumes throughout the African continent. For example, the South African-led business forum brought together automakers from South Africa, Botswana, and Namibia to set up integrated supply chains for production. This made South African auto exports more competitive in the AfCFTA’s single market. These measures have enhanced South Africa’s export volumes and promote regional cooperation and economic unity.
Similarly, the South African economic desk has been instrumental in advocating for investment prospects in the nation’s pivotal sectors, drawing significant foreign direct investment that bolsters regional economic growth and infrastructure improvement. The desk’s efforts to encourage investment in renewable energy projects have led to the creation of cross-border energy partnerships that offer long-term power solutions to countries nearby. These partnerships support the AfCFTA’s goals of long-term economic growth and environmental sustainability. This case study highlights the efficacy of diplomatic economic desks in harmonizing national economic agendas with regional integration objectives, thereby promoting a connected and robust African economy. The South African Desk’s strategic efforts in policy harmonization, trade facilitation, and investment promotion have substantially advanced the implementation of the AfCFTA’s goals, highlighting the essential function of economic diplomacy in fostering regional integration .
Case Study 3: The Rwandan Diplomatic Economic Desk in Kigali
The Rwandan Diplomatic Economic Desk in Kigali exemplifies how diplomatic economic desks can successfully connect national economic policies with regional integration objectives under the AfCFTA system. Located in the capital of Kigali, a center for many regional economic groups (RECs) including the East African Community (EAC), this desk has played a pivotal role in drafting trade agreements that correspond with Rwanda’s strategic objectives inside the AfCFTA. Utilizing its strategic position in one of Africa’s fastest-growing economic areas, Rudigi and Mawire maintains that the desk has effectively fostered discussions that align Rwanda’s regulatory norms with those of adjacent EAC member states, consequently diminishing non-tariff barriers and improving market access for Rwandan exports .
The Rwandan desk was instrumental in standardizing agricultural practices, resulting in a substantial increase in the export of Rwandan goods particularly agrarian products to neighbouring nations. The desk has drawn significant foreign direct investment (FDI) into Rwanda’s emerging industries, including technology and agriculture, by organizing regional trade missions and investment conferences. These measures enhance Rwanda’s economic development and further the wider aims of the AfCFTA by promoting intra-African trade and economic collaboration. A notable instance is the creation of a technology center by the Rwandan desk, which has drawn tech companies from around East Africa, fostering a collaborative atmosphere that promotes innovation and competitive advantage within the AfCFTA structures .
Importantly, the Rwandan desk’s success highlights the value of a well-chosen location and the capacity to interact with powerful regional players, proving that diplomatic economic desks can act as engines for regional and national economic growth. The desk’s aggressive involvement in fostering public-private partnerships has resulted in the establishment of linked supply chains across the region, hence improving the performance and competitiveness of Rwandan companies within the AfCFTA’s single market.
5.1 Comparative Examination and Analytical Perspectives
These case studies together underscore many essential observations about the role of diplomatic economic desks in the AfCFTA and wider regional integration initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa. The strategic arrangement of desks in key regional centers allows nations to immediately interact with essential economic players and negotiate advantageous conditions that align with both national and regional goals. The Rwandan desk’s position in the EAC facilitates the integration of Rwanda’s trade policies with those of its East African counterparts, hence improving regional trade dynamics.
Secondly, the capacity of diplomatic economic desks to maneuver bureaucratic negotiation procedures and address power imbalances is essential for establishing fair and durable economic relationships that enhance the overarching AfCFTA framework. The Nigerian desk’s management of national and regional interests in tariff talks illustrates the sophisticated techniques necessary to promote regional integration while protecting national economic interests.
Thirdly, the active organization of trade quests, investment forums, and business matchmaking events by these desks is crucial for improving intra-African trade and attracting foreign direct investment, thus promoting economic growth and regional cooperation. The Nigerian desk’s coordination of cross-border infrastructure initiatives and the South African desk’s facilitation of automobile industry forums exemplify how diplomatic economic desks implement regional integration through focused economic endeavours .
Nonetheless, these case studies also expose intrinsic hurdles that diplomatic economic desks must surmount to optimize their contributions to regional integration. Resource limitations, such as constrained resources and inadequately qualified staff, might hinder the efficacy of these desks in implementing comprehensive economic diplomacy activities. The Rwandan desk’s need for improved technical proficiency in regional trade facilitation highlights the necessity of ongoing capacity development and resource distribution. The unpredictable nature of global and regional economic trends, marked by swift technological progress and changing political coalitions, requires diplomatic economic desks to stay agile and consistently adjust their strategies to sustain relevance and effectiveness. The South African desk’s initiative to enhance green energy investments in alignment with global sustainability trends illustrates the need for diplomatic economic desks to innovate and adapt to changing economic environments.
Moreover, Ogunranti disclosed that guaranteeing fair allocation of AfCFTA beneficial prospects among member states necessitates that diplomatic economic desks adopt inclusive and participatory strategies that cater to the varied needs and capabilities of various African countries . This entails cultivating cooperation between advanced and developing nations in Africa, so encouraging equitable regional development and averting imbalances that could jeopardies integration initiatives.
Finally, this case study of the Nigerian, South African, and Rwandan, diplomatic economic desks demonstrate how these diplomatic units contribute strategically to the AfCFTA and regional integration in sub-Saharan Africa in many ways. Through the utilization of their expertise, the establishment of vital economic partnerships, and the management of intricate negotiation environments, diplomatic economic desks serve as pivotal tools of economic diplomacy that promote sustainable economic development and regional unity throughout the African continent. These diplomatic units not only negotiate and promote trade but also provide crucial support services that enable the implementation of AfCFTA’s goals, ultimately cultivating an integrated and resilient African economy .
To fully realize their potential, it is essential that these desks have sufficient resources, institutional backing, and ongoing capacity-building to tackle emergent difficulties and adapt to the changing economic landscape. Strategic investments in diplomatic economic desks, together with strong institutional structures and coordinated policy alignment, are crucial for enhancing their effectiveness in achieving AfCFTA’s goals of economic unity and resilience in the global market. Consequently, diplomatic economic desks are not only supplementary to national economic agendas but are also essential to the efficacy and transformational capacity of the AfCFTA, fostering regional integration and elevating Africa’s collective economic position globally.
6. Challenges Faced by Diplomatic Economic Desks
1. Resource constraints: The successful operation of diplomatic economic desks is severely hampered by a lack of resources, especially when it comes to African nations implementing the AfCFTA. Limited funding for economic diplomacy initiatives is one of the main problems. Many African nations underfund their diplomatic missions due to conflicting priorities and financial limitations, which leaves economic desks without the resources necessary to fulfill their mandates . This financial constraint affects many facets of their work, including conducting market research, keeping current economic databases, planning trade missions, and taking part in international forums.
A significant resource limitation is the lack of qualified individuals possessing the specific abilities needed for successful economic diplomacy. Economic desks frequently lack personnel with the sector-specific knowledge, investment promotion skills, and international trade law expertise required to navigate complex economic agreements like those experienced by AfCFTA. Due to competitive salaries offered in the private sector, it is difficult to attract and retain qualified professionals, which exacerbates the skills gap.
Lack of access to contemporary tools and platforms for data analysis, communication, and trade facilitation is another issue that many diplomatic economic desks face. African diplomatic economic desks are at a disadvantage due to this technological gap at a time when digital technologies are becoming more and more important to international trade and investment . The significance of digital capabilities in economic diplomacy has been further underscored by the COVID-19 pandemic, as numerous desks have found it difficult to adjust to virtual modes of engagement.
To overcome these resource limitations, more money must be spent as well as strategic capacity building and technology advancements to improve the efficiency of diplomatic economic desks in assisting with the implementation of the AfCFTA and larger regional integration initiatives.
2. Institutional barriers: The implementation of the AfCFTA and the promotion of regional integration are hampered by the substantial institutional obstacles diplomatic economic desks must overcome. The structure of diplomatic missions, which is frequently inflexible and hierarchical, is one of the main obstacles to effective economic diplomacy since it can hinder the responsiveness and agility needed. Berbeijk points out that because business facilitation and negotiations move quickly, conventional diplomatic structures might not be the best fit. In the larger diplomatic framework, economic desks frequently lack a clear mandate and authority, which causes misunderstandings and overlap with other departments or agencies that promote trade and investment .
The regular disconnection between diplomatic economic desks and pertinent domestic organizations, like trade ministries and investment advocacy organizations, is another institutional barrier. Economic diplomacy initiatives could be less successful considering the absence of communication synergy since it may lead to contradictory messaging and approaches. Moreover, because individuals with specialized knowledge and networks are frequently transferred to different job roles, the reshuffled system typical of diplomatic services can also break up the consistency of economic initiatives and network alliances established by economic desks.
Furthermore, in the fast-paced world of global investment and trade, administrative processes within diplomatic missions frequently slow down decision-making and responses due to bureaucratic tardiness, which can be harmful. This problem is especially severe in the context of the AfCFTA, where maximizing the rewards of the deal depends on quick reactions to new opportunities and difficulties . To overcome these institutional obstacles, diplomatic procedures and structures must be rethought to better meet the needs of contemporary economic diplomacy and regional integration programs.
3. Political Factors: Political factors, both domestically and in the larger regional context, have a major influence on the efficacy of diplomatic economic desks. Many African nations experience political instability, which can cause frequent changes in government priorities and policies. This can disrupt the continuity and consistency of economic diplomacy efforts. The mandates of diplomatic economic desks could change due to this instability, making it difficult to uphold the long-term plans and connections that are essential to successful economic diplomacy.
A major obstacle to the work of diplomatic economic desks is the disparity in national interests among African nations, especially when it comes to regional integration programs like the AfCFTA. Although most people agree that African economic integration is a good idea, individual nations frequently put their own short-term national economic interests ahead of regional goals. Because of this conflict of interest, discussions and execution of policy procedures often become more difficult, necessitating the use of diplomatic economic desks to negotiate challenging political environments.
Furthermore, domestic political groups can exert demand on governments to take protective measures that are contrary to the goals of the AfCFTA, such as protecting budding local industries from fierce competition from regional integration. According to Dietz, diplomatic economic desks frequently must strike a balance between the necessity of regional cooperation and these domestic political considerations . African leaders’ differing political commitments to regional integration may contribute to unequal competition, with some diplomatic economic desks receiving significant support for their initiatives while others face resource and support shortages.
For diplomatic economic desks, intricate political dynamics pertaining to questions of statehood and autonomy in economic decision-making also pose difficulties. As nations strive for increased economic integration, worries about losing jurisdictional control over important policy areas or economic sectors may surface, which could impede or complicate integration efforts. Diplomatic economic desks must be able to negotiate and have a sharp political sense in addition to economic knowledge to handle these delicate political issues.
6.1 Conclusion
The study delves deeply into the AfCFTA framework, where economic diplomacy and regional integration meet, demonstrating how diplomatic economic desks are crucial to strengthening Africa’s economy. The study shows that diplomatic economic desks play a big role in the achievement of AfCFTA strategic goals by making it easier for significant trade negotiations to transpire, encouraging a lot of commerce, and giving businesses across member states the backing they need. The findings revealed that the efficacy of negotiations and export promotion initiatives are strong predictors of the overall contributions of these desks to regional integration, supporting the qualitative findings that highlight their varied functions in coordinating national policies with regional goals and enhancing African trade and investment. Further demonstrating how strategic geographic locations, proactive economic initiatives, and skillful negotiation techniques can propel significant economic advancements and regional cooperation within the AfCFTA framework are case studies of the diplomatic economic desks in Nigeria, South Africa, and Rwanda .
The study reveals major problems that hinder the effective operation of the diplomatic economic desk, including resource limitations, institutional obstacles, and complex political dynamics. These obstacles underline the importance of progressive funding, institutional reforms, and political restructuring to increase the efficiency of these diplomatic units in fostering regional integration. This analysis confirms that diplomatic economic desks are essential tools of economic diplomacy that advocate, bargain, and promote trade while also offering vital support services that enable the implementation of AfCFTA’s goals. To fully realize their potential and surmount current challenges, it is essential to implement strategic recommendations that tackle the identified issues, enabling diplomatic economic desks to effectively promote Africa’s ambitious objectives of economic unity, sustained development, and improved global competitiveness . This comprehensive approach provides detailed knowledge of how economic diplomacy facilitates regional integration, offering essential data for diplomats, policymakers, and key players committed to achieving the objectives of AfCFTA.
6.2 Recommendations
It is essential to tackle the complex issues encountered by the diplomatic economic desk to improve their support for the AfCFTA and wider regional integration initiatives. Considering the study’s scope, analysis, and identified limitations, five principal suggestions are proposed:
1. Increase Funding and Resource Allocation
Resource limitations, such as restricted money allocations and inadequately trained staff, substantially impede the efficacy of diplomatic economic offices. African states should prioritize and augment funds for economic diplomacy activities to address these concerns. This could be accomplished by refocusing current expenditures, obtaining foreign grants, and cultivating public-private partnerships that offer supplementary financial resources. The Rwandan diplomatic economic desk effectively utilized augmented funding to create a regional technology center, drawing investments from all over East Africa and facilitating the AfCFTA’s goals of economic diversification and advancement in technology innovation. Nigeria’s economic desk received increased financial assistance, enabling infrastructure initiatives that correspond with AfCFTA’s objectives.
Governments must create extensive financing schemes that include both domestic and foreign financial sources. Moreover, creating specialized economic diplomacy funds under foreign ministries may provide ongoing financial backing. Investing in periodic training initiatives to develop a pool of skilled experts would mitigate the skills gap and improve the operating capabilities of the desks .
2. Revise Institutional Frameworks and Define Operational Mandates: Institutional obstacles, like rigid hierarchical frameworks and ambiguous demands, hinder the adaptability and efficiency of diplomatic economic offices. To improve their efficacy, it is crucial to restructure diplomatic missions to provide more adaptable, versatile, decentralized, and specialized operations. Explicitly defining the duties and authority of economic offices may avoid redundancies and guarantee cohesive and synergistic economic diplomacy initiatives. The South African economic desk restructured its organization to enhance integration with the African Union and Southern African Development Community (SADC), thereby promoting flexible and synchronized economic diplomacy campaigns that align with AfCFTA objectives .
Governments need to conduct institutional scrutiny through periodic auditing to identify and eradicate bureaucratic bottlenecks. Defining explicit lines of responsibility and communication pathways between diplomatic economic desks and domestic trade ministries would improve cohesion and consistency in policy execution. Furthermore, implementing flatter organizational structures may enhance decision-making processes and provide swifter reactions to new economic prospects and difficulties.
3. Augment Technological Proficiencies and Digital Framework Elaboration: The absence of access to modern instruments and tools for data analysis, dialogue, and trade promotion is a considerable obstacle for diplomatic economic desks. Improving technology competencies is essential for effective economic diplomacy, particularly in a more digitalized global trade landscape. Investing in cutting-edge data analytics software, communication technology, and digital trading tools will enhance the desks’ operational efficiency and facilitate adaptation to virtual interaction modes, as underscored during the COVID-19 epidemic. The Nigerian economic desk used modern data analytics techniques to track and analyze trade flows, yielding strategic insights that guide their bilateral trade negotiations and investment choices under the AfCFTA protocols.
Governments must invest in cutting-edge technology equipment and provide training to guarantee that diplomatic economic offices can successfully use these instruments. Collaborations with technology companies and global entities may enhance access to proficient online resources and encryption protocols, ensuring that teams stay adaptable and proficient in handling intricate economic data and digital diplomatic initiatives .
4. Promote Political Stability and Harmonize National Priorities with Regional Objectives: Expansion: Political instability and conflicting state interests substantially hinder the efficacy of diplomatic economic offices in advancing regional integration. Securing political stability and matching national priorities with the regional aims of AfCFTA is crucial for enduring economic diplomacy initiatives. Diplomatic economic offices must traverse intricate political terrains, reconciling state interests with the shared objectives of the AfCFTA. The South African economic desk effectively addressed political disparities within the SADC by advocating for comprised and participatory efforts that promoted inclusivity, synchronized national economic plans with regional integration objectives, thus augmenting the desk’s role in advancing AfCFTA’s aims.
Governments must prioritize political stability by ensuring unified and open policymaking, therefore mitigating the effects of political oscillations on foreign policy initiatives. Diplomatic economic offices must maintain regular communication with legislators and regional partners to guarantee that policy strategies are congruent with the goals of the AfCFTA. Furthermore, advocating for inclusive economic policies that cater to the varied needs and capabilities of distinct member states could promote the alignment of national priorities with regional integration objectives .
5. Allocate Resources for Capacity Enhancement and Professional Advancement: The efficacy of diplomatic economic desks depends on the presence of proficient and competent professionals with sector-specific expertise in investment advocacy and competence in global trade law. Engaging in capacity building and career growth is essential to closing the skills gap and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of these desks. The Nigerian economic desk established extensive training initiatives in collaboration with notable trade organizations to improve workers’ expertise in investment promotion and trade negotiations, thereby strengthening support for AfCFTA’s regional integration programs.
Governments need to institute periodic development and training initiatives in partnership with international organizations and academia. Scholarships, exchange programs, and specialized training courses should be organized for diplomats and economic officers to enhance their proficiency in critical aspects of economic diplomacy. Moreover, establishing incentive frameworks, including competitive remuneration and possibilities for career progression, can draw and keep competent personnel at the diplomatic economic desk.
6.3 Concluding Remarks and Final Reflections
Executing these ideas necessitates a collaborative endeavour among African governments, regional economic communities, and foreign stakeholders to provide a conducive atmosphere for the flourishing of diplomatic economic desks. African governments could substantially enhance their diplomatic economic desks by resolving resource limitations, revising institutional frameworks, boosting technology competencies, promoting political stability, and pursuing capacity development. This would improve their capacity to further the AfCFTA’s goals of regional integration, economic unification, and sustainable development, eventually establishing Africa as a significant participant in the global marketplace.
References
Adams, Kweku, Rexford Attah-Boakye, Honglan Yu, Irene Chu, and Dafydd Mali. “African Continental Free Trade Area and Regional Trade in ICT and Digital Technologies.” Journal of International Management 30, no. 4 (August 2024):N.PAG-N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2024.101156.
“AfCFTA, Boost for African Economies.” Business Weekly (Knowledge Bylanes), August 14, 2023, N.PAG-N.PAG.
Ajibo, Collins Chikodili. “African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement Investor Protection and Capital Market in Africa.” Journal of Financial Crime 32, no. 1 (January 2025): 154–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2023-0332.
Akpan, Udoh James, and Sazelo Michael Mkhize. “The Domestic Politics and Policies in Nigeria and South Africa: Catalyst or Hindrance to AfCFTA Goals.” Journal of African Union Studies 12, no. 3 (December 2023): 147–65. https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4306/2023/12n3a7.
Chidozie, Felix, Goddy Uwa Osimen, Joy Bhadmus, and Oluwamurewa Newo. “Sustainable Development Goals Implementation in a Post‐colonial African State: Any Future for the African Continental Free Trade Free Trade Area?” Sustainable Development, September 17, 2024, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3183.
Chitimira, Howard, and Friedrich Hamadziripi. “An Analysis of the Legal Implications of the African Continental Free Trade Area’s Rules of Origin on Economic Integration and Constitutionalism in Africa.” Perspectives of Law & Public Administration 11, no. 3 (October 2022): 363–71.
Coke-Hamilton, Pamela. “‘AfCFTA Will Give Africa the Power to Change the Terms of Trade.’” African Business, no. 480 (February 2021): 48–51.
Debrah, Yaw A., Oluwaseun E. Olabode, Femi Olan, and Richard B. Nyuur. “The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): Taking Stock and Looking Ahead for International Business Research.” Journal of International Management 30, no. 2 (April 2024): N.PAG-N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2024.101120.
Dietz, Charles. “AfCFTA Opens New Era of Possibilities for African Trade.” African Business, no. 508 (November 2023): 60–61.
Draper, Peter, Habtamu Edjigu, and Andreas Freytag. “Analysing Intra-African Trade: AFCFTA: Much Ado About Nothing?” World Economics 19, no. 4 (October 2018): 55–74.
Fofack, Hippolyte. “Making the AfCFTA Work for ‘The Africa We Want.’” World Economics 22, no. 4 (October 2021): 103–50.
Hinkle, Lawrence E., and Maurice Schiff. “Economic Partnership Agreements Between Sub-Saharan Africa and the EU: A Development Perspective.” World Economy 27, no. 9 (September 2004): 1321–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0378-5920.2004.00654.x.
Jancic, Davor. “Regional Parliaments and African Economic Integration.” European Journal of International Law 30, no. 1 (2019): 199–228.
Katz-Lavigne, Sarah, and Moses N. Kiggundu. “African Continental Integration Scholarly Literature Review: Advances, Gaps, and Opportunities.” Africa Journal of Management 5, no. 4 (November 2019): 303–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2019.1676100.
Kone, Salif. “A Plea for the Construction of a General Economic Theory of International Commercial and Diplomatic Negotiations.” USV Annals of Economics & Public Administration 24, no. 1 (January 2024): 78–89.
Makokera, Catherine Grant, and Mary-Beth Makokera. “South Africa’s Trade Policy Post COVID-19.” South African Journal of International Affairs 27, no. 4 (December 1, 2020): 561–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2020.1866656.
Mogashwa, Phillip Tumelo, and Sehludi Brian Molele. “Documenting Major Drivers of Trends in Trade Balance for SADC Region amid the Full Implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA).” International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12, no. 3 (April 2023): 286–96. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2292.
MRANI, DOUAAE. “Economic Diplomacy Through Free Trade Agreements (Moroccan Case),” 2022. https://openaccess.iku.edu.tr/bitstreams/c56cc124-864b-438c-98de-f1068dcacd8c/download.
Ngidi, Telesphorous Lindelani, and Nirmala Dorasamy. “Barriers to Implementation of Batho Pele Framework for Service Delivery in the Public Sector, a Case of South Africa.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance, January 2013, 205–13.
Ofori, Isaac K., William G. Cantah, Benedict Afful, and Saddam Hossain. “Towards Shared Prosperity in sub‐Saharan Africa: How Does the Effect of Economic Integration Compare to Social Equity Policies?” African Development Review / Revue Africaine de Développement 34, no. 1 (March 2022): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12614.
Ogunranti, Akinwumi. “Dispute Resolution in the AfCFTA Investment Protocol: A Preliminary Assessment and Proposal for Business and Human Rights Arbitration.” Journal of World Investment & Trade 25, no. 5/6 (December 2024): 666–97. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340343.
Okadia, Fiona, Emmanuel Wa-Kyendo, Melody Njeru, Darmi Jattani, and Leo Kemboi. “Designing an AfCFTA-Driven Continent-Wide Competition Policy Around the Regional Economic Communities.” Antitrust Bulletin 66, no. 4 (December 2021): 556–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X211045749.
Oyelami, Lukman O. “Revenue, Welfare and Trade Effects of African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AFCFTA) on Nigerian Economy.” Journal of Public Affairs (14723891) 22, no. 4 (November 2022): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2645.
Shinyekwa, Isaac M. B., Enock N. W. Bulime, and Aida Kibirige Nattabi. “Trade, Revenue, and Welfare Effects of the AfCFTA on the EAC: An Application of WITS‐SMART Simulation Model.” Business Strategy & Development 4, no. 1 (March 2021): 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.157.
Stack, Marie M., Emmanuel B. Amissah, and Martin Bliss. “African Economic Integration and Trade.” World Economy 47, no. 5 (May 2024): 2122–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13538.
Sylvester, Motadi Masa. “Globalisation of Economies: The Role of Regional Integration in Repositioning African Economies within the Global Order.” African Journal of Business & Economic Research 19, no. 4 (December 2024): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2024/v19n4a1.
Takefman, Bruce. “Breaking down the AfCFTA.” Oilseeds Focus 10, no. 3 (September 2024): 62–63.
Van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. “Diplomatic Barriers to Trade.” De Economist (0013-063X) 140, no. 1 (April 1992): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849803.
Vhumbunu, Clayton Hazvinei, and Joseph Rukema Rudigi. “Facilitating Regional Integration through Free Movement of People in Africa: Progress, Challenges and Prospects.” Journal of African Union Studies 9, no. 2 (August 2020): 43–64. https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4306/2020/9n2a3.
Vhumbunu, Clayton Hazvinei, Joseph Rukema Rudigi, and Charity Mawire. “Consolidating African Regional Integration through the African Continental Free Trade Area: Lessons from the ASEAN Free Trade Area.” Journal of African Union Studies 11, no. 2 (August 2022): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4306/2022/11n2a5.
