A R T I C L E  I N F O		A B S T R A C T
Article history: Received: 04/11/2025 Accepted: 05/11/2025 Posted Online: 05/11/2025		This paper critically examines the role of human capital, particularly education, in driving economic growth in Kenya. While gains in access have contributed to rising literacy rates, systemic challenges persist that limit education’s transformative potential. These include deficiencies in quality, enduring regional and gender-based inequalities, and misalignment between educational curricula and labor market demands. Drawing on theoretical frameworks such as Human Capital Theory and Endogenous Growth Theory, the paper analyzes recent education trends, policy reforms, and sectoral initiatives. Special attention is given to the role of international development actors and public-private partnerships (PPPs) in addressing existing gaps and enhancing human capital outcomes. The analysis underscores that unlocking education’s full contribution to economic development requires a comprehensive and inclusive approach, one that prioritizes pedagogical quality, equity in resource allocation, curriculum modernization, and responsiveness to labor market dynamics. Key policy recommendations include increased investment in teacher training and infrastructure, targeted interventions to address regional and gender disparities, reforms to technical and vocational education and training (TVET), and the promotion of educational innovation. These strategies are essential for building a skilled, adaptable workforce and fostering long-term, inclusive economic growth in Kenya.

 

1.      Introduction

Human capital stands as a cornerstone of economic growth, particularly within the context of developing nations striving for long-term advancement. This concept, encompassing the skills, knowledge, health, and attributes of a population, is increasingly recognized as a central determinant of a country’s productive capacity and its ability to sustain development. Within this broader framework, education serves as a critical building block that empowers individuals, improves labour efficiency, and drives innovation, ultimately transforming economies [1, [2].

This paper explores the relationship between capital, focusing primarily on education, and economic growth in Kenya. Kenya has ambitious developmental goals and the aspiration of becoming “Africa’s Singapore,” and acknowledges the vital importance of human capital in achieving these objectives. This recognition is evident in its participation in the World Bank’s Human Capital Project, a global initiative promoting strategic investments in people to accelerate inclusive economic growth [3].

Kenya is among the 95 countries that have collaborated with the World Bank to enhance human capital outcomes.   Kenya’s current Human Capital Index (HCI) stands at 0.55, a score that, while above the Sub-Saharan Africa average of 0.40, still lags global high performers such as Singapore, which boasts an HCI of 0.88 [3]. This disparity underscores the substantial potential for Kenya to enhance its human capital and catalyse long-term economic transformation. The need for targeted human capital development becomes even more urgent given Kenya’s young demographic profile and persistent social challenges. Although the country has experienced steady economic growth, averaging over 5% in the past decade [4]. This growth has not always translated into equitable income distribution. Poverty remains widespread, and inequality has not significantly declined [5]. Education, by equipping individuals with relevant skills and enhancing productivity, is viewed as a powerful equalizer that can bridge income gaps, improve employability, and foster social mobility.[6]

This paper argues that while education is a crucial driver of potential economic growth in Kenya, its impact is constrained by systemic challenges of quality, equity, and relevance. Addressing these challenges through targeted policy interventions is essential to realize education’s transformative power fully. Understanding this dynamic is critical for sustainable development by designing policies that align educational outcomes with national development goals, particularly those related to job creation, technological advancement, and poverty reduction.

To address this question, the paper reviews relevant secondary literature and proceeds by first conceptualizing human capital through a definition of its dimensions and its significance in economic development theory. It then examines the theoretical and empirical linkages between education and economic growth, with a focus on key transmission mechanisms. The discussion continues with an analysis of recent trends, reforms, and persistent challenges in Kenya’s education sector, followed by a critical assessment of government policies, funding structures, and strategic investments in education. The paper concludes with a synthesis of key findings and offers actionable recommendations to enhance the role of education in driving Kenya’s economic growth.

2.      What is Human Capital?

The term human capital has become increasingly prominent in economic discourse as a key determinant of economic development and societal well-being. It broadly refers to the stock of knowledge, skills, competencies, health, and attributes embodied in individuals that enable them to be productive contributors to the economy. The World Bank defines human capital as “the knowledge, skills, and health that people accumulate throughout their lives, enabling them to realize their potential as productive members of society” [7]. Similarly, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) describes it as “the stock of knowledge, skills and other personal characteristics embodied in people that helps them to be productive” [6]. These definitions underscore the recognition of human capital as an economic asset, comparable to physical capital, that can be cultivated through deliberate investment and yields returns in the form of enhanced productivity, higher incomes, and sustained economic growth.

However, human capital is not a monolithic construct; it encompasses several interdependent dimensions. Education remains central, covering both formal and informal learning that fosters cognitive and technical skills. Health, encompassing physical and mental well-being, affects an individual’s capacity to learn, work, and contribute meaningfully to society. Skills development, particularly vocational and technical competencies, further shapes how effectively individuals participate in increasingly complex labor markets [8]. Importantly, these elements interact in reinforcing ways: improved health enhances educational outcomes, while higher education levels are correlated with better health behaviours and access to information. A holistic view of human capital, therefore, is essential to designing integrated policy interventions aimed at inclusive development.

3.      Theories of Human Capital

The relationship between education and economic growth is both intricate and contested, necessitating evolving theoretical frameworks that more accurately reflect its complexity. Classical and neoclassical growth models initially focused on the contributions of physical capital and labor, treating human capital as an exogenous or residual factor. While foundational, these models failed to explain how education and skills development contribute to long-term economic growth, prompting the development of more nuanced theories that place human capital at the center of development discourse.

3.1.   Human Capital Theory

Human Capital Theory, most notably advanced by economists Gary Becker and Theodore Schultz, posits that investments in education and health enhance individuals’ cognitive and non-cognitive abilities, thereby enabling greater labor market productivity and contributing to economic growth [8], [9]. Becker conceptualized education as a form of capital accumulation, where individuals and societies invest in human capabilities much like they do in physical capital, with the expectation of economic returns. Schultz emphasized the role of education in increasing efficiency and fostering innovation within the workforce, particularly in developing economies.

Building on this foundation, economists such as Paul Romer and Robert Lucas positioned human capital as central to sustained economic progress, shifting the narrative from exogenous to endogenous sources of growth [1], [10]. Human capital, in this view, is not subject to diminishing returns in the same manner as physical capital. Instead, education, by fostering knowledge, skills, and innovation, becomes a self-reinforcing engine of development. This is particularly salient in the context of digital transformation and global interdependence, where the capacity for adaptation, innovation, and knowledge generation increasingly defines economic competitiveness, especially for emerging economies like Kenya.

3.2.  Endogenous Growth Theory

Closely aligned with Human Capital Theory is Endogenous Growth Theory, particularly through the work of Romer and Lucas, which emphasizes that economic growth is primarily driven by factors internal to the economy, chief among them education, technological progress, and knowledge accumulation [1], [10]. Unlike neoclassical models that treat technological advancement as exogenous, endogenous models argue that innovation arises from intentional investment in human capital and research.

In this framework, education plays a crucial role by fostering innovation, facilitating the diffusion of technology, and enhancing individuals’ capacity for creativity and problem-solving. As a result, investments in education not only raise individual earnings but also yield broader societal returns by driving sustained, innovation-led economic growth. This makes education a strategic lever for long-term development planning, particularly in contexts where industrial upgrading and knowledge-intensive sectors are emerging priorities.

3.3.  Relevance to the Kenyan Context

These theoretical frameworks hold particular relevance for Kenya, where the promise of human capital development has been widely endorsed in policy discourse but inconsistently realized in practice. While Human Capital Theory suggests that investments in education and health lead to greater productivity and economic growth, Kenya’s experience reveals that expanding educational access alone does not automatically translate into economic transformation.

Despite steady increases in enrollment and public expenditure on education, significant mismatches persist between academic qualifications and labor market needs. A substantial proportion of university and TVET graduates face unemployment or underemployment, raising concerns about the responsiveness of the education system to economic demands [11]. As Oketch notes, the assumption that educational expansion inherently fosters economic development is increasingly untenable in the Kenyan context [12].

Moreover, critics argue that the prevailing human capital discourse tends to obscure structural and political dimensions of education. Framing education as a neutral, technical solution to underdevelopment often ignores its role in reproducing social inequalities [13]. The focus on STEM and entrepreneurship, for instance, while economically justified, risks marginalizing the humanities and indigenous knowledge systems that are vital for social cohesion, critical thinking, and democratic citizenship.

The commodification of education, driven by a market-oriented interpretation of human capital, has also led to the proliferation of low-quality private institutions and credential inflation, especially in urban areas [14]. These trends are exacerbated by weak regulatory oversight and limited quality assurance mechanisms. While Endogenous Growth Theory emphasizes the role of knowledge and innovation, Kenya’s innovation ecosystem remains underdeveloped, hampered by weak linkages between universities, industries, and research institutions [15].

International development actors such as the African Development Bank (AfDB) and the European Union’s Directorate-General for International Partnerships (EU INTPA) have played a significant role in shaping Kenya’s human capital agenda. The AfDB’s High 5 development strategy identifies human capital as a critical pillar. It has funded programs such as the “Jobs for Youth in Africa” initiative and Kenya’s TVET and Skills Development Project [16]. Similarly, EU INTPA has supported Kenya through targeted investments in teacher training, ICT integration, and school feeding programs, especially in arid and semi-arid regions [17]. These aim to align skills development with labor market demands and address youth unemployment. These initiatives also promote gender equity and rights-based education, aligning with Kenya’s constitutional values. However, fragmented coordination between donors, local governments, and implementing partners has sometimes reduced impact by creating parallel systems that undermine national ownership. Effective decentralization and integration with national frameworks are essential to enhance the sustainability of these interventions.

While donor-supported initiatives align with endogenous growth principles by promoting innovation and capacity-building, they also risk imposing externally driven priorities that may not fully reflect local socio-economic realities. The emphasis on STEM and measurable outcomes (e.g., enrolment or completion rates) can unintentionally marginalize broader educational goals such as civic education, ethical development, and cultural preservation.

Kenya’s demographic profile, with over 75% of its population under the age of 35 (Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) presents both a critical opportunity and a potential vulnerability [18]. If investments in human capital are not inclusive, contextually grounded, and equity-focused, they may entrench cycles of exclusion and social discontent. Thus, while international development support remains vital, its effectiveness depends on enhancing local ownership, fostering institutional collaboration, and addressing systemic inequities that constrain education’s transformative potential.

Human Capital Theory and Endogenous Growth Theory provide valuable frameworks for understanding the role of education in economic development. However, their application in Kenya must be tempered by a critical awareness of local socio-economic, political, and institutional dynamics. Investment alone is insufficient. To realize the transformative potential of human capital, Kenya must adopt a holistic, inclusive approach that addresses systemic inefficiencies, aligns education with labor market realities, and fosters equity and innovation. International development actors can play a catalytic role, but their interventions must prioritize sustainability, contextual relevance, and structural reform over short-term performance metrics. Only then can education serve as a genuine engine of inclusive, long-term economic growth.

4.      Education Trends and Challenges in Kenya

Kenya’s education system has undergone significant reforms in recent years, aiming to improve educational access, relevance, and outcomes while aligning more closely with labour market demands. Yet, persistent challenges related to quality, equity, and relevance continue to hinder its full potential in driving economic development.

4.1.  Trends

Recent education data from Kenya highlight a complex and evolving landscape, revealing both positive strides and significant challenges in human capital development. Public primary school enrolment dropped sharply from 8,849,268 in FY 2021/22 to 6,445,582 in FY 2023/24. This decline can be attributed to the rollout of the Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC), which reorganized grade levels, as well as demographic shifts such as declining fertility rates and urban migration [19].

Conversely, secondary education enrolment showed consistent growth, rising from 3,587,081 to 4,036,650 during the same period. This increase can be partly credited to the government’s 100% transition policy, ensuring that all children who complete primary education progress to secondary school [20]. The growth in secondary enrolment also reflects increased parental awareness of the economic value of continued education.

Enrolment in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions surged by 51.81%, from 250,733 in FY 2021/22 to 406,649 in FY 2023/24. This shift underscores the government’s focus on skills development to align education with labour market needs and to address the challenges of youth unemployment and underemployment [19]. Public universities also saw a 9.5% increase in enrolment, reaching 680,768 students in FY 2023/24, signalling the continued importance of tertiary education as a pathway to upward mobility despite concerns over graduate employability.

KNBS data reveals a total of 2.9 million learners in pre-primary, 10.2 million in primary, and 4.1 million in secondary schools as of 2023. These figures indicate a system under strain, especially at lower educational levels, highlighting the challenge of maintaining quality amid expansion [19].

While enrolment statistics reflect progress, literacy rates provide deeper insight into educational outcomes. Kenya’s adult literacy rate rose from 78.73% in 2014 to 82.88% in 2022, indicating positive progress. Youth literacy (ages 15–24) is even higher, approaching 90%, which highlights the success of universal education initiatives targeting younger populations [21]. However, disparities remain, with male literacy at 83% compared to 80% for females, revealing persistent gender inequalities that need targeted interventions. Additionally, urban-rural literacy gaps persist, further underscoring the need for more equitable allocation of resources to underserved areas. Despite these gains, transition rates beyond primary education remain alarmingly low. In 2018, only 49.8% of students completed primary school, 24.5% completed secondary education, and just 3.5% reached tertiary levels [22].

Empirical evidence emphasizes that the quality, not merely the quantity, of education is a significant determinant of economic performance in developing countries. Hanushek and Woessmann emphasize that cognitive skills measured through standardized tests are more strongly correlated with GDP growth than school attainment alone. Countries with higher average test scores tend to experience faster and more sustained economic growth, underscoring the importance of foundational learning. In their analysis of 76 countries, they found that a one standard deviation improvement in test scores is associated with a 2% increase in annual GDP per capita growth [23].

These statistics underscore a critical bottleneck in the education system that hampers the development of a fully skilled labour force, thereby constraining national productivity and long-term economic competitiveness. However, this challenge also presents a strategic opportunity: by investing in education quality and aligning learning outcomes with labor market demands, countries can unlock significant economic gains, enhance human capital, and position themselves more competitively in the global economy.

4.2.  Challenges

Despite commendable strides in expanding access to education, Kenya’s education system continues to face deep-rooted challenges that constrain its capacity to harness human capital for sustainable economic growth effectively. These challenges are multifaceted, encompassing infrastructural inadequacies, teacher shortages, systemic inequalities, and a persistent misalignment between education outputs and labor market requirements.

A central constraint on human capital formation is the quality of teaching. Although access to education has widened, learning outcomes remain suboptimal, largely due to deficiencies in teacher effectiveness. Bau and Das emphasize that teacher quality has a profound impact on student learning, with effective teachers yielding significantly higher cognitive gains [24]. This directly resonates with endogenous growth theory, which identifies the accumulation of human capital through both formal education and quality instruction as a key engine for innovation and long-term productivity gains. Yet, Kenya faces a shortfall of over 90,000 qualified teachers, resulting in overcrowded classrooms and limited individualized attention [25]. Further compounding this issue, Bold and other researchers reveal that many teachers in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Kenya, often lack adequate content mastery and pedagogical skills, thus undermining efforts to build a high-quality human capital base [26]. Addressing this deficit through sustained investment in teacher training and professional development is therefore essential to unlocking the productivity-enhancing potential of education.

Moreover, regional and gender disparities in access to and completion of education remain serious impediments to equitable human capital development. Learners in marginalized areas, particularly in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs), experience lower enrolment and retention rates, driven by poverty, insecurity, and cultural norms that disproportionately affect girls [27]. These disparities limit the inclusiveness of economic growth and perpetuate intergenerational cycles of disadvantage. Crouch and Gove argue that unequal access to quality education exacerbates income inequality by curbing learning opportunities for already marginalized populations [28]. In Kenya, interventions such as bursaries and school feeding programs have attempted to mitigate these challenges, but their impact remains uneven. Refugee populations are especially vulnerable, facing compounded barriers to educational access. Dryden-Peterson highlights how limited inclusion within national education frameworks impairs the long-term integration and economic contribution of displaced learners [29]. Kenya’s Education Sector Policy for Refugee Learners [30] represents a progressive step, yet persistent gaps remain, particularly in higher education access and employment transitions [31].

A further structural challenge lies in the disconnect between educational outcomes and labor market demands. Despite growing enrolment rates, many graduates, especially from universities, lack the skills required by employers in sectors such as technology, manufacturing, and services. Filmer and Fox identify this skills mismatch as a significant constraint on youth employment and national competitiveness [32]. Human capital theories emphasize that not just the quantity, but the quality and relevance of skills determine economic returns. In Kenya, a disproportionate focus on academic education has undermined the role of technical and vocational education and training (TVET), which is critical for equipping youth with employable skills. Hagos and Schauwecker argue that TVET must be prioritized in national education strategies to meet the demands of a dynamic labor market [33]. However, curriculum reform remains slow, hindered by institutional inertia and inadequate investment, further entrenching youth unemployability.

Financial constraints further exacerbate these challenges. Although public education spending has increased, systemic inefficiencies, including delayed disbursements, poor financial management, and underinvestment in infrastructure, impede the implementation of necessary reforms [25]. A lack of digital infrastructure, such as ICT labs and broadband connectivity, curtails the integration of modern teaching methods and digital literacy, both of which are critical to 21st-century skill development. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have emerged as a potential avenue to bridge resource gaps. However, as Robertson and Verger caution, overreliance on private actors without a strong regulatory framework risks fragmenting the education system and widening inequalities [34]. Thus, infrastructure investments must be strategically coupled with systemic efforts to enhance the human capital ecosystem, particularly in terms of curriculum relevance, teacher capacity, and learning environments.

Kenya’s education system, therefore, stands at a pivotal juncture. While access has expanded, the persistent challenge of low-quality hampers the effective translation of education into productive human capital. The theoretical underpinnings of human capital and endogenous growth models emphasize that economic growth is increasingly knowledge-based and reliant on cognitive, technical, and innovative capacities. As such, Kenya must pursue coordinated and comprehensive reforms targeting learning outcomes, teacher quality, gender equity, and labor market alignment.

A more integrated approach, linking educational institutions, industry, and government policy, is critical to addressing the structural mismatch between education and employment [35], [36]. In parallel, targeted investments must address regional and gender disparities to ensure all segments of society can contribute to and benefit from human capital development.

In conclusion, while the challenges facing Kenya’s education sector are profound, they also present an opportunity for transformation. Strategic reforms that prioritize quality, relevance, and equity can unlock the full economic potential of Kenya’s human capital. Such investments are not only critical for individual mobility and national productivity but also for positioning Kenya competitively in an increasingly innovation-driven global economy.

5.      Specific Programs and Initiatives

To translate the government’s strategic investments and policies into tangible outcomes, various specific programs and initiatives have been implemented in Kenya’s education sector. These initiatives aim to address challenges such as access, quality, and relevance of education, with a focus on fostering human capital development. These programs provide a better understanding of how they contribute to enhancing the country’s human capital and supporting economic growth.

5.1.  Free Basic Education

Since the early 2000s, Kenya has made substantial progress in expanding access to basic and secondary education through Free Primary Education (2003), Subsidized Secondary Education (2008), and the 100% transition policy, leading to significant enrolment growth (Ministry of Education, 2024). However, this rapid expansion has strained infrastructure, reduced learning quality, and exacerbated regional and socioeconomic disparities. The introduction of Competency-Based Education (CBE) in 2017 was a major reform aimed at promoting practical skills and aligning education with labor market needs. Yet, its implementation has faced challenges such as inadequate teacher training, uneven rollout, and resource shortages, which risk entrenching existing inequalities [7].

Evidence from other developing countries shows that early learning outcomes strongly influence future employability and earnings, underscoring the need for quality-focused reforms [37]. Furthermore, some scholars argue that economic growth drives educational expansion rather than the reverse, suggesting that without improvements in quality and relevance, increased access alone will not yield meaningful human capital gains [38]. Therefore, Kenya must complement access-driven reforms with strategic investments in teaching quality, infrastructure, and curriculum relevance to ensure education drives inclusive economic growth and fully realizes the demographic dividend.

5.2.  Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET)

Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) is increasingly recognized as a central pillar in Kenya’s education and employment strategy, particularly in the context of Vision 2030 and the Big Four Agenda. The government’s sustained investment in TVET institutions represents a strategic response to persistent youth unemployment, skills mismatches, and the structural transformation required for industrialization. The surge in TVET enrolment, by 51.81% between FY 2021/22 and FY 2023/24 to over 400,000 students, signals both policy commitment and growing demand for alternative pathways to employment [39].

Yet, despite these gains, TVET continues to suffer from entrenched societal perceptions that favor university education, reinforcing the idea that vocational pathways are inferior. This cultural bias not only discourages enrolment but also undermines the sector’s potential to deliver equitable employment outcomes. The Kenya National Qualifications Framework (KNQF), alongside reforms like industry-aligned curricula, aims to strengthen the relevance and transferability of skills, thereby enhancing the credibility of TVET credentials [40].

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have also emerged as a vital mechanism in improving the quality and market relevance of TVET. Notable examples include the collaboration between the Kenya Association of Manufacturers (KAM) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), which has facilitated curriculum enhancement and the provision of modern equipment [41]. These partnerships reflect the broader objectives of human capital theory, which emphasize employability and productivity through relevant skill acquisition. However, the increasing focus on short-cycle technical training raises concerns about the neglect of broader competencies such as adaptability, creativity, and critical thinking skills, which are crucial in the Fourth Industrial Revolution [42]. Moreover, the lack of social protections for youth in apprenticeship programs invites ethical scrutiny, particularly in informal training arrangements.

To fully leverage TVET as a vehicle for human capital development, persistent systemic issues must be addressed. These include underfunding, inconsistent quality assurance mechanisms, and weak industry linkages. Without a coherent national strategy that addresses these limitations, the promise of TVET as a transformative force will remain unrealized [43].

5.3.  Higher Education Financing

Kenya’s higher education sector has witnessed rapid expansion, with university enrolment increasing by 9.5% in FY 2023/24. This growth reflects both rising demand for tertiary education and policy efforts to widen access. However, the sector faces mounting concerns over graduate employability and quality assurance. The proliferation of university programs, especially following the liberalization of parallel programs, has strained institutional capacity, leading to under-resourced faculties, outdated curricula, and declining academic standards.

To address funding inefficiencies, the government introduced the Differentiated Unit Cost (DUC) model, administered through the Higher Education Loans Board (HELB). While this model was intended to link funding with student needs and program costs, universities continue to struggle with delayed disbursements and insufficient resources [44]. These challenges are compounded by a persistent misalignment between academic training and labor market demands, contributing to underemployment and skill underutilization among graduates.

Recognizing these concerns, curriculum reforms have been initiated in both universities and TVET institutions, with a particular focus on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), digital literacy, and entrepreneurship. The African Development Bank (AfDB) has supported these reforms through targeted investments in skills development and innovation capacity as part of its broader “High 5s” agenda and the Jobs for Youth in Africa Strategy [16]. Nonetheless, the impact of these interventions is often diluted by limited institutional capacity, regional disparities in access, and a labor market that cannot absorb the increasing number of graduates.

Philanthropic actors like the Mastercard Foundation (MCF) have also played an influential role, especially through initiatives such as Young Africa Works Kenya, which aims to equip five million youth with market-relevant skills by 2030. MCF’s emphasis on entrepreneurial models and cross-sectoral collaboration has spurred innovations in curriculum design and job placement [45]. However, these efforts raise important questions about the sustainability of donor-driven models and the risks of creating parallel systems that may not be fully integrated into national education policy frameworks.

Ultimately, enhancing the quality and inclusiveness of higher education requires more than curriculum revisions. It calls for systemic reforms in pedagogical methods, faculty development, and evaluation practices. Without such holistic transformation, Kenya risks producing a generation of graduates ill-prepared to meet the complex demands of a knowledge-based economy, thereby undermining the country’s efforts to realize its demographic dividend and long-term development goals.

5.4.  Educational Innovations

In parallel with systemic reforms, Kenya has embraced educational innovations, particularly in digital learning. Initiatives such as the Kenya Education Cloud, the Digital Literacy Programme (DLP), and the Ajira Digital Program have expanded access to e-learning resources and equipped youth with digital skills relevant to online freelancing [46]. These innovations are reshaping pedagogy and enabling more flexible, technology-enhanced learning environments. However, the digital divide, particularly in rural and marginalized areas, remains a significant challenge. Limited internet connectivity, insufficient teacher preparedness, and the high cost of digital devices continue to hinder equitable access to digital learning opportunities [47].

The integration of digital learning into Kenya’s education system holds significant potential for enhancing human capital by equipping learners with 21st-century skills critical for a modern, technology-driven economy. A study by Valerio and other scholars across Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa found that education systems that prioritize problem-solving, creativity, and critical thinking foster higher levels of innovation and small business formation [48]. This is particularly important for economies transitioning from agriculture to services and industry.

In conclusion, while Kenya’s education reforms and technological innovations are promising steps toward a more dynamic learning ecosystem, their effectiveness is contingent upon equitable implementation, strengthened institutional capacity, and sustained investment in infrastructure and teacher training. Without addressing these persistent systemic challenges, the aspiration to harness education as a key driver of inclusive economic transformation may remain unrealized.

6.      Education as a Driver of Economic Growth

Education is universally recognized as a cornerstone of human capital development and a key determinant of long-term economic growth. Its influence operates through diverse channels, such as enhancing labor productivity, fostering innovation, facilitating technological adoption, and improving health outcomes [49], 2018). The relationship between education and economic growth, though complex and context-dependent, consistently underscores that education, when adequately resourced and equitably delivered, acts as a catalytic force for national development [21].

In Kenya, human capital plays a pivotal role in shaping the country’s economic trajectory, with human capital accounting for approximately 69% of the nation’s total wealth [50]. This highlights the critical importance of education and health systems in harnessing the country’s demographic dividend, as over 75% of the population is under 35 years old [4]. However, to fully capitalize on this potential, Kenya must effectively invest in the education and skills of its youthful population. Failure to do so risks exacerbating youth unemployment, inequality, and social instability [25].

At the microeconomic level, education enhances individual capabilities in areas such as literacy, numeracy, and cognitive skills like problem-solving and adaptability. These skills not only boost individual productivity but also improve employability and workplace efficiency [49]. Furthermore, a skilled labor force supports technological upgrading, economic diversification, and innovation, critical components for structural transformation in developing economies [1], [10].

Education’s role in fostering innovation is emphasized in endogenous growth theories, where it is seen as essential for generating new ideas and enhancing the absorption of existing technologies [1]. In Kenya, the growth of ICT education and digital literacy programs has empowered a new generation of entrepreneurs, particularly in fintech, agri-tech, and e-commerce. However, the uneven distribution of digital skills across the population remains a challenge, necessitating more targeted investments in STEM education to ensure widespread participation in the digital economy [51].

Despite its potential, the education-growth nexus has limitations. As Pritchett observes, the mere expansion of schooling does not guarantee economic returns if quality, relevance, and institutional coherence are absent [52]. In Kenya, although access to education has expanded, concerns persist about curriculum relevance, the quality of instruction, and the alignment of educational outputs with labor market needs. For instance, while university enrolment has increased, there is a surplus of graduates in oversaturated disciplines, coupled with a shortage of technical skills required in high-growth sectors like manufacturing, construction, and digital services [25].

Education also plays a critical role in enhancing entrepreneurial capacity, which is particularly important in Kenya, where formal employment opportunities remain limited. OECD asserts that education enhances the ability to identify business opportunities and manage enterprises efficiently. Kenyan youth-led innovations, such as M-Pesa, exemplify the transformative potential of education when combined with entrepreneurial ecosystems [53]. However, education alone is insufficient to support sustainable entrepreneurship; factors such as access to finance, regulatory frameworks, mentorship, and infrastructure are equally crucial for success [16].

In addition to economic outcomes, education yields important social benefits, particularly in health. Educated individuals are more likely to engage in preventative healthcare and make informed health decisions, which in turn enhances productivity and reduces work disruptions [2]. In Kenya, school-based health education programs, especially those targeting girls, have positively impacted areas like reproductive health, hygiene, and nutrition, which carry long-term intergenerational benefits for human capital development [27].

However, the benefits of education are not evenly distributed. Structural inequalities, such as regional disparities, gender gaps, and socio-economic exclusion, continue to hinder the realization of education’s full potential [52]. In marginalized regions, the quality of education remains constrained by factors such as inadequate infrastructure, teacher shortages, and cultural barriers. These disparities contribute to cycles of poverty, undermining the goal of inclusive growth [50].

Moreover, the misalignment between education and labor market demands remains a significant challenge. While the government’s expansion of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions aims to address skills mismatches, persistent challenges, such as weak industry linkages, inconsistent quality, and the societal bias favouring university education, undermine the effectiveness of these efforts. Without stronger integration between training providers, employers, and policymakers, the education system may fail to prepare the labor force for evolving industry needs adequately [43].

In conclusion, education in Kenya is a vital driver of economic growth, fostering productivity, technological advancement, health improvements, and entrepreneurship. However, for education to effectively contribute to long-term economic transformation, significant reforms are needed. These should focus on enhancing curriculum relevance, improving teacher quality, addressing institutional inefficiencies, and aligning educational outcomes with labor market demands. Only through comprehensive systemic reforms can Kenya realize the full potential of its human capital and harness its demographic dividend for sustainable economic growth [6, 35].

7.      Conclusion and Policy Recommendations

This paper has examined the theoretical underpinnings and empirical realities of human capital development in Kenya, with a particular focus on the role of education in driving long-term economic growth. Drawing on Human Capital Theory and Endogenous Growth Theory, the analysis has demonstrated that while Kenya has made commendable strides in expanding access to education, critical challenges persist, particularly in quality, equity, and alignment with labor market demands. International actors, public-private partnerships, and domestic reforms all play an evolving role in shaping this landscape. The empirical evidence presented underscores that mere expansion of enrolment is insufficient; the transformative potential of education as a driver of economic development depends on the quality and relevance of learning, the efficiency of resource use, and the inclusivity of access. In this context, two interrelated policy priorities emerge as particularly urgent and actionable.

Kenya’s education reform can prioritize foundational and transformative interventions to enhance human capital development. First, investing in teacher training and upgrading school infrastructure is essential to improve learning outcomes, especially in underserved areas. Without quality instruction and conducive environments, gains in access will not translate into economic benefits. Second, modernizing Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) is critical to align skills development with labor market demands. This includes curriculum reform, digital and green skills integration, and expanded industry partnerships for practical training. Third, addressing regional and gender disparities through cross-sectoral policies, such as improved sanitation, social protection, and protection from gender-based violence, is vital to ensure inclusive development.

These recommendations are supported by empirical evidence and align with Kenya’s Vision 2030 and BETA agendas. They not only address current system inefficiencies but also build a resilient, equitable, and future-ready education system capable of driving inclusive economic growth.

 

References and Bibliography

African Development Bank (AfDB). 2020. “Jobs for Youth in Africa Strategy 2016–2025.” Abidjan: African Development Bank.

———. 2023. “African Economic Outlook 2023: Mobilizing Private Sector Financing for Climate and Green Growth.” Abidjan: African Development Bank.

Aslam, M., F. Bari, and G. Kingdon. 2019. Early Learning and Employment Outcomes: Evidence from South Asia. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE) Programme. Oxford: University of Oxford.

Barro, R.J., and J.W. Lee. 2013. “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World.” Journal of Development Economics 104: 184–98.

Bau, N., and J. Das. 2020. “The Misallocation of Pay and Productivity in the Public Sector: Evidence from the Labor Market for Teachers.” American Economic Review 110, no. 1: 219–63. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180674.

Becker, Gary S. 1993. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 3rd Edition. 3rd edition. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

Bold, T., D. Filmer, G. Martin, E. Molina, C. Rockmore, B. Stacy, and W. Wane. 2017. “What Do Teachers Know and Do? Does It Matter? Evidence from Primary Schools in Africa (Policy Research Working Paper No. 7956).” World Bank.

Crouch, L, and A. Gove. 2017. “What We’ve Learned about Universal Primary Education: What Progress, What Limits, and What’s next?” RTI Press. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2017.op.0043.1709.

Dryden-Peterson, S. 2016. “Refugee Education: The Crossroads of Globalization.” Educational Researcher 45, no. 9: 473–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16683398.

European Commission. 2023. “EU-Kenya Cooperation Strategy: Education and Skills for Sustainable Development.” Brussels: European Commission INTPA.

European Union International Partnerships (EU INTPA). 2024. “Youth and Skills Development in Africa: Towards an Integrated Approach.” Brussels: European Union.

Filmer, D., and L. Fox. 2014. “Youth Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Washington, DC: World Bank.

Hagos, H., and B. Schauwecker. 2020. “Technical and Vocational Education and Training in Africa: A Continental Perspective.” Bonn: GIZ.

Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2015. The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

KAM & GIZ. 2022. “Skills for Industry Partnership Report.” Nairobi: Kenya Association of Manufacturers.

Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis. (KIPPRA). 2022. “Inequalities in Access to Education in Kenya: Policy Brief No. 78/2022.” Nairobi: Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis.

Kenya Ministry of Education. 2024. “Education Sector Report FY 2023/24.” Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). 2023a. “Economic Survey 2023.” Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.

———. 2023b. Kenya Economic Survey 2023. Nairobi: Government Printer.

———. 2024. “Economic Survey 2024.” Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.

Kenya National Qualifications Authority (KNQA). 2022. “Kenya National Qualifications Framework (KNQF).” Nairobi: Kenya National Qualifications Authority.

Lucas, Robert E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22, no. 1: 3–42.

Mastercard Foundation (MCF). 2021. “Young Africa Works: Kenya Strategy.” Nairobi: Mastercard Foundation.

McGrath, S. 2012. “Vocational Education and Training for Development: A Policy in Need of a Theory? 32(5), 623–631.” International Journal of Educational Development 32, no. 5: 623–31.

Ministry of Education. 2018. “Education Sector Policy for the Inclusion of Learners and Trainees with Disabilities.” Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

———. 2019. “Digital Literacy Programme (DLP) Implementation Report.” Nairobi: Ministry of Education.

———. 2024. “Basic Education Statistical Booklet.” Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

Ministry of ICT, Innovation and Youth Affairs. 2021. “Ajira Digital Program: Empowering Youth through Digital Skills.” Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

Musai, M, and M Mehrara. 2012. “The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Human Capital in Developing Countries.” Journal of Social and Development Sciences 3, no. 7: 256–64.

Nelson, R.R, and E.S Phelps. 1966. “Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth.” The American Economic Review 56, no. 1: 69–75.

Ng’ethe, N., V. Wawire, and M. Mutisya. 2022. “Graduate Employability in Kenya: Bridging the Skills Gap.” Nairobi: Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis.

OECD. 2021. “FDI Qualities Policy Toolkit.” Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/investment/.

Oketch, M. 2006. “Determinants of Human Capital Formation and Economic Growth of African Countries.” Economics of Education Review 25, no. 5: 554–64.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2012. “Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives: A Strategic Approach to Skills Policies.” Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Pritchett, L. 2001. “Where Has All the Education Gone?” The World Bank Economic Review 15, no. 3: 367–91.

Psacharopoulos, George, and Harry Patrinos. 2004. “Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update.” Education Economics 12, no. 2: 111–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964529042000239140.

Republic of Kenya. 2021. “Education Sector Report 2021/22–2023/24.” Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

Robertson, S., and A. Verger. 2012. “Governing Education through Public Private Partnerships. In S. Robertson, K. Mundy, A. Verger, & F. Menashy (Eds.), Public Private Partnerships in Education: New Actors and Modes of Governance in a Globalizing World (Pp. 21–42).” Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Romer, Paul M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5: 71–102.

Schultz, Theodore W. 1961. “Investment in Human Capital.” The American Economic Review 51, no. 1: 1–17.

Sifuna, D. N, and N. Sawamura. 2010. “Challenges of Quality Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Some Key Issues.” Springer.

Tikly, L. 2017. “Education for Sustainable Development in Africa: Issues of Pedagogy, Curriculum, and Teacher Education.” International Journal of Educational Development 32, no. 3: 243–51.

UNDP. 2022. “Kenya Human Development Report.” Nairobi: United Nations Development Programme.

UNESCO. 2020. “Education Progress Analysis: Kenya.” Paris: UNESCO.

———. 2022. “Global Education Monitoring Report 2022: Gender Inequality in Education.” Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO IICBA. 2023. “Human Capital Development in Kenya.” Addis Ababa: UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2023. “Kenya Literacy Rate Data.” UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2022. “Kenya: Refugee Education Report 2021–2022.” Nairobi: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Valerio, A., K. Herrera-Sosa, and M. J. Lopez. 2026. “Are There Skills Payoffs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? Empirical Evidence Using STEP Data.” Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. 2018. The Human Capital Project. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/psd/power-of-financial-reforms-in-fragile-states.

———. 2021. “Kenya Education Sector Public Expenditure Review.” Washington DC: The World Bank Group.

———. 2023a. “Kenya Economic Update: Creating Markets for Youth Employment.” Washington DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/7092daa8-a05b-5881-b9e0-c25818a12fec.

———. 2023b. “TVET Sector Reform in Kenya: Policy Directions and Progress.” World Bank Blogs.

 

[1]               P. M. Romer, “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 71–102, 1990.

[2]               R. J. Barro and J. W. Lee, “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 104, pp. 184–198, 2013.

[3]               World Bank, “TVET sector reform in Kenya: Policy directions and progress.” World Bank Blogs, 2023.

[4]               Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), Kenya Economic Survey 2023. Nairobi: Government Printer, 2023.

[5]               UNDP, “Kenya Human Development Report.” United Nations Development Programme, Nairobi, 2022.

[6]               Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), “Better skills, better jobs, better lives: A strategic approach to skills policies,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2012.

[7]               World Bank, The Human Capital Project. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018. Accessed: Mar. 31, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/psd/power-of-financial-reforms-in-fragile-states

[8]               T. W. Schultz, “Investment in Human Capital,” The American Economic Review, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1961.

[9]               G. S. Becker, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 3rd Edition, 3rd edition. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

[10]            R. E. Lucas, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–42, 1988.

[11]            N. Ng’ethe, V. Wawire, and M. Mutisya, “Graduate Employability in Kenya: Bridging the Skills Gap,” Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis, Nairobi, 2022.

[12]            M. Oketch, “Determinants of human capital formation and economic growth of African countries,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 554–564, 2006.

[13]            L. Tikly, “Education for Sustainable Development in Africa: Issues of pedagogy, curriculum, and teacher education.” International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 243–251, 2017.

[14]            D. N. Sifuna and N. Sawamura, “Challenges of Quality Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Some Key Issues.” Springer, 2010.

[15]            World Bank, “Kenya Education Sector Public Expenditure Review,” The World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2021.

[16]            African Development Bank (AfDB), “Jobs for Youth in Africa Strategy 2016–2025,” African Development Bank, Abidjan, 2020.

[17]            European Commission, “EU-Kenya Cooperation Strategy: Education and Skills for Sustainable Development,” European Commission INTPA, Brussels, 2023.

[18]            Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), “Economic Survey 2023,” Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Nairobi, 2023.

[19]            Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), “Economic Survey 2024,” Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Nairobi, 2024.

[20]            Ministry of Education, “Basic Education Statistical Booklet,” Government of Kenya, Nairobi, 2024.

[21]            UNESCO Institute for Statistics, “Kenya Literacy Rate Data.” UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2023.

[22]            UNESCO, “Education Progress Analysis: Kenya,” UNESCO, Paris, 2020.

[23]            E. A. Hanushek and L. Woessmann, The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.

[24]            N. Bau and J. Das, “The misallocation of pay and productivity in the public sector: Evidence from the labor market for teachers.” American Economic Review, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 219–263, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180674.

[25]            World Bank, “Kenya economic update: Creating markets for youth employment,” World Bank, Washington DC, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/7092daa8-a05b-5881-b9e0-c25818a12fec

[26]            T. Bold et al., “What do teachers know and do? Does it matter? Evidence from primary schools in Africa (Policy Research Working Paper No. 7956).” World Bank, 2017.

[27]            UNESCO, “Global Education Monitoring Report 2022: Gender inequality in education,” UNESCO Publishing, Paris, 2022.

[28]            L. Crouch and A. Gove, “What we’ve learned about universal primary education: What progress, what limits, and what’s next?” RTI Press, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2017.op.0043.1709

[29]            S. Dryden-Peterson, “Refugee education: The crossroads of globalization,” Educational Researcher, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 473–482, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16683398.

[30]            Ministry of Education, “Education sector policy for the inclusion of learners and trainees with disabilities.” Government of Kenya, Nairobi, 2018.

[31]            United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), “Kenya: Refugee education report 2021–2022.” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Nairobi, 2022.

[32]            D. Filmer and L. Fox, “Youth employment in sub-Saharan Africa,” World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014.

[33]            H. Hagos and B. Schauwecker, “Technical and vocational education and training in Africa: A continental perspective,” GIZ, Bonn, 2020.

[34]            S. Robertson and A. Verger, “Governing education through public-private partnerships. In S. Robertson, K. Mundy, A. Verger, & F. Menashy (Eds.), Public Private Partnerships in Education: New Actors and Modes of Governance in a Globalizing World (pp. 21–42). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2012.

[35]            African Development Bank (AfDB), “African Economic Outlook 2023: Mobilizing Private Sector Financing for Climate and Green Growth,” African Development Bank, Abidjan, 2023.

[36]            European Union International Partnerships (EU INTPA), “Youth and skills development in Africa: Towards an integrated approach,” European Union, Brussels, 2024.

[37]            M. Aslam, F. Bari, and G. Kingdon, Early learning and employment outcomes: Evidence from South Asia. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE) Programme. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2019.

[38]            M. Musai and M. Mehrara, “The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Human Capital in Developing Countries,” Journal of Social and Development Sciences, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 256–264, 2012.

[39]            Kenya Ministry of Education, “Education Sector Report FY 2023/24,” Government of Kenya, Nairobi, 2024.

[40]            Kenya National Qualifications Authority (KNQA), “Kenya National Qualifications Framework (KNQF),” Kenya National Qualifications Authority, Nairobi, 2022.

[41]            KAM & GIZ, “Skills for Industry Partnership Report,” Kenya Association of Manufacturers, Nairobi, 2022.

[42]            S. McGrath, “Vocational education and training for development: A policy in need of a theory? , 32(5), 623–631.,” International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 623–631, 2012.

[43]            Republic of Kenya, “Education Sector Report 2021/22–2023/24,” Government of Kenya, Nairobi, 2021.

[44]            Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis. (KIPPRA), “Inequalities in access to education in Kenya: Policy brief No. 78/2022.” Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis, Nairobi, 2022.

[45]            Mastercard Foundation (MCF), “Young Africa Works: Kenya Strategy,” Mastercard Foundation, Nairobi, 2021.

[46]            Ministry of ICT, Innovation and Youth Affairs, “Ajira Digital Program: Empowering youth through digital skills.” Government of Kenya, Nairobi, 2021.

[47]            Ministry of Education, “Digital Literacy Programme (DLP) implementation report.” Ministry of Education, Nairobi, 2019.

[48]            A. Valerio, K. Herrera-Sosa, and M. J. Lopez, “Are there skills payoffs in low- and middle-income countries? Empirical evidence using STEP data.” World Bank, Washington, DC, 2026.

[49]            G. Psacharopoulos and H. Patrinos, “Returns to investment in education: a further update,” Education Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111–134, 2004, doi: 10.1080/0964529042000239140.

[50]            UNESCO IICBA, “Human Capital Development in Kenya.” UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa, Addis Ababa, 2023.

[51]            R. R. Nelson and E. S. Phelps, “Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth,” The American Economic Review, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 1966.

[52]            L. Pritchett, “Where Has All the Education Gone?” The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 367–391, 2001.

[53]            OECD, “FDI Qualities Policy Toolkit,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2021. Accessed: Mar. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/investment/

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

I gratefully acknowledge the support of Euclid University and extend my sincere appreciation to my supervisor, Prof. Laurent Cleenewerck, whose guidance and mentorship were instrumental in the development of the Major Paper that formed the foundation for this paper.